If you had done your research you might have found out why.

Nah, fuck this letter-writer. The entirety of the letter can be summed up as “I’m mad, justify my anger!” This was between him and the other customer, and he chose to do nothing. End of story.

It’s too late to do something you stupid moron, you should have done it at that moment, venting about it now does nothing and why the fuck would the restaurant give a fuck about something another customer did to you other than not breaking up a fight in their place.

that makes something like 99% of sex-havers rapists.

LOL - now they’re stalking me and talking shit about me to other people replying to me in other threads on completely different stories. They are OBSESSED.

Wow. That’s really sad. I don’t think I’ve ever witnessed anyone becoming so unhinged and violently angry over someone simply commenting that they obviously didn't read the story before commenting. It is truly bizarre - but makes for some good laughs, though!

They get them by making them up because they are either too lazy to read the articles, or too dumb to understand them. And it looks like that person has actually dismissed all of the replies to them except the one agreeing with them.

If she’s giving interviews to the Post about this, I find it kind of hard to criticize Splinter for passing it along.  She let the cat out of the bag.

Name changes are not only public, but some states/counties require you to announce the name change in the paper.

Also - lets all not forget that this (and all statements made by the couple about Bobbitt) is allegedly and not proven fact at this point:

Ah, personal attacks. Always the best (and most mature) approach.

You’re right that there is no ambiguity there - she is very clear and specific in what she said. And yet, you still manage to get it wrong. It's quite astounding, I must say.

Better idea: read the words in the screen shot you just posted, and watch the segment of the interview leading up to the 3:00 mark (starting at 2:13) so YOU know exactly what they are talking about 

Explain “how” she didn’t claim to have viewed a tape on which Trump uses the n-word? There’s no “how” to be explained there - she just ...didn’t.

And yet, she did not.

No, she did not. 

“and that she was personally invited by them to view it - which she claims she did.”

“(Omarosa) has also drawn attention by claiming that she has a tape of Trump using the n-word from her days on The Apprentice.”

I don’t see what’s so “Brooklyn” about that. I don’t know if you’re doing a disservice to *yourself* — i.e. I don’t go home from my marketing job lamenting my ad’s click-thru rates deep in my soul— but you’re doing a disservice to your business if you’re ignoring social and the power of getting that elusive viral hit.…

The expression on his face is the real scandal, and it is no hoax. The POTUS is covering up a patch that says Harley because that’s what tough guys do, deprive their rivals of media exposure.