blanchardr2
BlanchardDude
blanchardr2

While I understand how you may feel the way you do, I would like to disagree. Just because he stated that he learned how to do it from a news story shouldn’t mean regulating the press. The press brought to light a loophole that allows people to illegally obtain firearms. I believe that we not only need gun control but

Rest in Peace, Verne. We will miss you.

And this is the man who was elected: a bully and a coward. Mr. Trump, stop the incessant tweets. Going after one of the reporters who wrote this article just because you do not like the article (which for you is another day at the office) is not helping you. To me, you act like a petulant child chided by the teacher

I watched the entire video and it saddens me that these “children” want to create this video where gay sex acts are used to exert power while defaming non-WASP citizens. It did not look like satire to me. They were mocking the disenfranchised, and they were all white boys.

I was watching my TiVo’d episode of Once Upon a Time, and in the last two minutes, it was interrupted by Breaking News. The newscaster said that “The President” would be making an announcement about Syria in a few moment, and my thought immediately went to “That f***nut just started a war with Syria.” Then I heard his

OMG I laughed so hard at your ridiculous reply. Temper tantrum? Wow, check out the mirror lol. I do not know where you got self-important clown from my statement, but that’s your issue not mine. And as far as covfefe, how do you know? The idiot in chief failed to respond to it.

First, great deflection off how the idiot in the White House abuses his position while forcing the tax payers to flip his bill at HIS resort. You do realize he is profiting from us, right? I realize Obama went to Hawaii when he was President, but as far as legislation passed, you are a little off (Covfefe Drumpf was

It is amazing how messed up the election was, and how much it still affects the nation. But, why is this White House person being a hypocrite? It is because someone that was not her boss was talking about the election. He has sole domain to it. His rival, not so much.

You are absolutely correct and I do overreact.

The Supreme Court should be non-partisan, right? In my mind that makes it the best to truly judge on Constitutional law. Or am I just crazy?

I find most sites I visit are bloated with the ads and detract from the articles I want to peruse. But, that ad you showed seems like a weird choice. Wonder if they cycle automatically when you refresh.

These organizations are not spouting news, they are spouting propaganda. So, anyone that has a dissenting voice will, of course, be the center of their negative spin machine. It is how propaganda machines work. Logic does not even factor into the mechanisms.

I am pretty sure there is an AdBlocker plug in for Firefox so you can make the ads disappear.

Thanks for the clarification. Still, this is the latest in messed up.

His ideology was to cause death to at least one person. His entered a populated area with a weapon capable of killing multiple people. Hearing gun shots outside your classroom can cause terror inside the classroom. We tend to think that terrorism means religious or political ideologies. I think anyone in the situation

He terrorized the school when he entered and shot someone, therefore a terrorist. He shot someone, therefore a shooter. Intentions may mean something, but action is key.

First, that is a huge safety issue. The shooter could have killed the resource officer and then started shooting other people if he was inclined, even though the events did not unfold that way. Let’s put aside what we believe his motives might have been and just look at this fact: The shooter put at risk other people

ICE is a dangerous organization that routinely oversteps its legal boundaries. They are thugs and terrorists. You may think that they are doing a good job by acting forcefully to remove illegal immigrants, but most of these immigrants pay their taxes, quietly work, and overall contribute to their communities and our

Except we do go back and forth as there have been cases presented to the United States Supreme Court to “clarify” the meaning of the 2nd Amendment (United States vs Cruikshank, 1875; Presser vs Illinois, 1886; United States vs Miller, 1939; District of Columbia vs Heller, 2008; MacDonald vs City of Chicago, 2010;

Please, no to Hayden Christianson. He was just awful. I found his acting to be forced happy or forced angry, no real angst. Adam Driver would have made a better Anakin, as he seems to portray the nuance of someone struggling between duty and desire.