Those titles feel like they were written by a new Tom Haverford/Jean Ralphio venture.

Don’t leave out this:

Darren Rovell is my mother-in-law?

Yeah, this issue came up on the Salty Waitress column over on the Takeout a couple weeks ago.

Speaking as pro-employee, restaurants should integrate the costs of employee health insurance into their pricing. Restaurants who insist on this surcharge are, as you say, just passive-aggressively complaining about…

That’s a solid burn on the end but I really have to say you definitely go no caption/ “line” there. Zooming in on “Guests: 1" and leaving it w no comment is stone cold and objectively much funnier.

He doesn’t make a good point really, but his attention is useful as the business could learn from this. Don’t give the Darrens of the world a choice to opt out. Bake it into the prices and then tell the Darren Rovells that their prices per item reflect their employees living a good life with good health insurance and…

I strongly, strongly recommend clicking through and watching him get torn to tiny little brand-humping shreds in the replies.

I want to see his fucking tip.

The only surprising thing here is that Rovell didn’t follow this up with a “life pro-tip” about how you can save money by basing your tip off the pre-tax total instead of post-tax. At which point we probably would find out he tips 10% anyway because anything higher is reserved only for “superior” service in his eyes.

1) Go to your job and say what Gillis said and see if your boss doesn’t fire you. Gillis is also bad at his job (he’s not funny).

1) I said I make jokes like the one Yang makes but about Jews, to fellow Jews. I don’t go out on national TV and make cringey jokes.

I wish these articles wouldn’t just focus on the teacher. He’s messed up and it’s really fucked that he’s trying to get them to acknowledge that they violated his rights.

The amount of brand-new commenters on this article is something else.

I suppose I could be a secular Christian?  I believe in the historicity of Christ, and I believe in the relevance of his teachings.  As to his divinity, I do not know, nor do I think that matters, as much as it does to embody his teachings: to love others, and to value charity and compassion and mercy.  

We shall henceforth refer to him has “Mr. Dickhead,” because to call him otherwise would be “telling a lie.”

Imagine feeling so much hate about something that you harrass a child. What a sad, pathetic person.

Besides the point, but the teacher definitively knows this student’s “biological sex” how, exactly?!

Don’t forget sections about not inverting the Y-axis in video games and avoiding paying bills of less than $1 with a credit card. There are some things the Bible is just crystal clear about.

Just ugly. I mean, how is this any different than a teacher simply arguing, “Well you *look* like a girl, therefore I’m calling you she/her.” All these religious reasons people cite as justification to be cruel and callous and exclusionary.