blahhhhh2
Blahhhhh2
blahhhhh2

Season 1 introduced us to Q, season 1 is totally forgiven any perceived wrongness.

With Michael Bay in charge this was always going to be a shitshow. A crazy idea, what about Sam Raimi? He did pretty well with injecting the first couple of Spiderman movies with just the right mixture of fun and heft, I think he could do a good job with the similarly wise-cracking turtles. Joss Whedon could also work

This is exactly my policy: 1 trailer and that’s it, just enough to gauge the tone, the premise, and the overall feel. I’m not virulently anti-spoiler, but I would prefer not being bored by seeing everything I’ve already seen

DC’s movies look better then I expected so I think that was a surprise, especailly because Avengers 2 has worn me down a bit with Marvel’s movies.

Now the question is, will this person also maturely admit it?

Yep, this. Of course two demigods battling it out in the city are going to cause widespread destruction. But Snyderman showed no concern at all for anybody until the train station scene. He saved a few from death by heat vision, while allowing thousands to die in collapsing buildings. Of course, this was well after he

Sure, there’s destruction. And superman saves people as the city is being destroyed. And he doesn’t break peoples necks. This guy should not have that role. He doesn’t understand the charicter and he clearly never will.


So why can’t the end credit scenes be about the accual movie and not being a lazy advert for another?

This is incredibly pedantic and I’m sorry but it’s causing an itch at the base of my skull: the book is “A Feast for Crows”. As in a large meal that crows would enjoy. I agree with the actual content of your post but you touched my Song of Ice and Fire nerve and pedantry is just the reflex. Sorry.

A story fundamentally about rape is too ‘rapey’. The hell you say!?

I think that this dilemma is exactly what Fury Road was about, specifically the dangers of hope without reason contrasted with fanaticism without foundation. Basically, the movie is about how people can become blind to the dangers of their perceived superior version of things (either the world they “hope” to see or

“GoT being another particularly great example which is why people hate AFoC and ADWD because they are essentially backstory for the next two books”

As always with these kinds of alarmist piece, this is grossly overblown. Yes, it’s a dumb (but fun) movie. Yes I have tons of problems with it. But honestly, I don’t think it succeeding is a somehow apocalyptic event. Flood of crappy imitators? Every succesful movie has those. Even the first Jurassic Park had tons of

Copy paste: 1977 Star Wars, Jaws and the Godfather ruined movies.

Jarvis!

Loki, Odin and good portion of Asgardians, Agent Carter, are a few

Is it actually worse for newbies, though? The old saying “dying is easy, comedy is hard” is not a new one. Audiences are cruel, but that’s been true for eternity.

If he was a professional writer who turned down other commissions while working on that one, and it did not come out, I can see how that would seriously impact the progress of a career.