It’s probably simpler - she had already played a “bad-assed” character and like the Shatner’s or Ford’s of the world, the fear of getting typecast was probably very real for her.
It’s probably simpler - she had already played a “bad-assed” character and like the Shatner’s or Ford’s of the world, the fear of getting typecast was probably very real for her.
Rebrand as Babbage’s you cowards.
I think Bros. had a strategic misstep in the marketing phase. I distinctly remember watching it and kind of grinning and then there was some throw away line like “remember straight people?”
Thing is - look at the comments on this and other threads. There is a long history of Microsoft being crossways with anti-trust and a long list of people who would like to see nothing but bad things happen to them comparables be damned.
Strangely - Disney is probably the premier example of why buying physical media is ideal. Long before streaming, Disney utilized “the vault” (or basically denying the ability to purchase things for set periods of time) to both jack up the price of their media and push product. It’s been interesting to watch Netflix…
It’s a valid course of logic though.
I mean I heard about DA:O from other RPG fans. So the success to some extent was tied to the genre and didn’t go outside of it. What inherent risk there was in the property was both by virtue of being an RPG in the American market and making the game as dark as it was.
I’m not even sure if that’s as true as people make it out to be.
It’s a fair point but it exists largely so no single character stays dominant for too long because they all have different play styles. Essentially there’s no “perfect” balance to the game so a permanent state would basically immediately make half the the characters completely pointless, a handful of characters useful…
Fujoshi as a topic is always going to be fraught. If we accept that it’s a bit... objectifying with straight guy’s and Yuri, then it’s really, really, really hard to avoid twisting yourself into knots to not see the potential skeeze factor that gay men may see being viewed that way. In the end there are far more…
Sure they are - just not in this forum where where the editorial staff and moderation staff are heavily leaned towards doing that job themselves and other then report and move on there’s not much to do. There’s very little need to defend them when this form isn’t really an oppressive space for the LGBTQ community.…
Well that, and lets just be blunt - there’s a bunch of variation and it’s a smaller part of an overall structure which itself can have a bunch of variability. Trying to compare it to the male sex organ is kind of silly because the male version is stupidly obvious.
Bingo.
Kind of fascinated by the reaction to your comment. I will say your comment did veer from making a point to being patronizing.
Yep - and the original Iron Man (which if you believe what some say) was considered a B list superhero and had a 140 million dollar budget... in 2007 money. I’d argue in reality, everyone who paid attention to comics knew exactly who he was if you accept that Captain America was A-Tier.
Alright Comrade.
By definition, ANY video he creates is self-serving. The only variable is helping people or not. Predatory would require changing definitions.
People have kind of lost the plot here so lets break it down into arguments:
The dynamic of egalitarianism vs. elitism is very old. Society almost always shifts between the two. But allowing elitism to run rampant too long usually ends in even more overt societal controls preventing movement meanwhile too much egalitarianism causes production problems because frankly some people aren’t cut out…
Isn’t that just being a hipster?