Pretty much. I can dig maybe the guy is the reason she's not interested most of the time, but then maybe that's ALSO a conversation that should be had. Or maybe she has a libido issue. Or maybe his is so high that it comes off like a drug addict in need of a fix. But in the end, the guy chose to initiate the…

I'm actually shocked they floated UT Dallas as an option. The average enrolling student there has test scores and grades above the UT Austin campus average student.

I'd say my issue would be that while it's valid for some women to have that feeling, the problem it runs up against is (especially when dealing with feminist men), it sort of leaves certain equality issues as verboten which (again, while understandable) causes women who do not have that specific hang up or feminist…

To be fair, I don't think most guys would actually hold it against you. And not for any loftier reason than most people empathize with their own gender first. Whether or not that's good for society as a whole, it seems to be most people's default mode.

Time. Like a lot of issues, people don't really change on it but part of the people who's beliefs are set will die off while the young will probably continue to be split except the young tend to veer towards individual rights in general.

This about a thousand times. Years ago I was in a class where we looked at these numbers and found roughly the same thing. Same sex couples often did about the same as or sometimes better than hetero couples with kids. But how hetero couple's have kids and the conditions of it are on average more variable.

No, I'd find it problematic either way honestly. Finding an extra 5 points on a test through more studying is also optional. But the choice to study more is not different between men and women.

The problem I have with that however is that equality in a place of education is a requirement (and something that can be certainly be appealed if it's readily apparent.) If you acknowledge that the points in a class are necessarily exclusionary in terms of work and commitment (based on sex which is a protected…

Just going to make the point having now read both articles, Berlatzky's dig was how the show deals with men when it does, NOT with the ratio of representation of the show. Most of the article is dedicated to it or specifically the systemic injustice that occurs within the criminal justice system. The…

Do you need to buy? I'm not being flip here. Unless you're actually Catholic, the Pope's primary concern can't be you. And if you are Catholic, unless you're mobilized in some way, you're still not going to matter.

And if he did that, would the existing power structure collapse and splinter off? Realistically speaking, could some believe that people are being removed for ideological or petty reasons? If the answer to that is yes, then the political reality the Pope actually deals with (and that Salon ignores) is that his power…

I would keep in mind "rewriting the law" is already going to vary by state since only 19 actually make it illegal to do so. Therefore knowing when you can't leave a child in a car (if the law is not a factor) is very much the responsibility of the parent. Sure we recommend people don't do it because of the risk. …

Fair enough. But my point is that this is the kind of thing people have reflexive responses to when the variables involved are fairly controllable. The more risk averse you are, the more you're going to display total caution EVEN if that caution isn't warranted. The choice to wear a seatbelt has a cost to a person…

Of what though? My single mother left me in the car many times around that age especially on long trips. Often it was my choice and often she was gone for less than 5 minutes. Yes, bad things can happen when someone makes that choice. But can doesn't mean "probably", "likely", or "on average."

Is it though? Tell that to the gaming industry.

The problem is it doesn't matter unless reactions to the rhetoric actually sway the election. The reaction to homophobia is going to have to result in a gay or lesbian person winning because of it. Ditto for sexism. I just don't see politics working that way though since it requires self interest be a smaller…

And that's sort of the point of the study. People believe it exists yet swear they're not contributing. It exists, yet it's not a major problem. How would people that lack that experience know these things? And these really aren't just millennial polls. If you looked at polls for Gen X, they would not look…

Interesting they went with the fourteenth amendment. I'd think you could settle this in the Constitution proper with the commerce clause and the supremacy clause. Unless the state is actually regulating this as a health issue (only one of the aspects they mention), I fail to see where they are constitutionally…

In many areas I've seen that experience, yes. In a city where you can drive everywhere and your job/social group restricts you to areas where you do not experience a great amount of diversity unless you intentionally break out of it, yes it happens. That doesn't mean people don't get some diversity at an office per…

I don't think you can conflate managerial traits with entertainment and political traits. Business management is much more intimate and you own the room you create. You pay for excess in a way that political and entertainment figures don't. O'Reilly et. al derive popularity primarily from ratings and people watch…