Yeah. Their entire theory cold be blow out of the water by going to a grocery store and observing the couples there.

But the horny men online who whine about not being able to get a girlfriend...totally valid. A woman wants a greater purpose in life - she’s being dramatic. But an even more privileged dude can’t get laid because of his obvious, seething hatred of women - valid. Everyone cry for him. And we should force women to…

I think its both. They can’tgetsex but even if they could they definitly dont want “roasties”. Thats why the idea of sex woworkers wouldnt solve this. (Not because sex workers are all “roasties” but because incels would always assume they are and would never accept them.) It assumes that what they say is what they…

They don’t want sex workers. Having to pay for sex - which is something any man can do - just underscores how undesirable they are.

Ugh, don’t put it on sex workers to be these guys’ therapists and sort out their mommy issues, too. You talk about them learning to own their own shit and not put it on someone else... but your suggested way of achieving that is for them to foist their shit on someone else.

The regulation of booze and tobacco has not made either ‘safe’ from abuse by anyone with personality/desire to do so.

Their bodies are not the price we pay for peace. That’s horrific. Also, incels don’t want sex workers, they want the perfect 10s their non-ass-wiping grossness deserve. Or...something like that.

Trump lies so much I’m beginning to wonder if MS 13 is even real.

Petersen is a not-very-sophisticated “philosopher” who for some reason manages to never have to debate another academic of equal standing or reputation.

Sex workers would not make an incels happy. In fact many incels could turn to prostitution if they wanted too but they actively refuse to do so. You will see this constantly on the forums they infest.

Exactly. That’s why sex workers are not an acceptable answer for them, they’re “too good” to pay for what no one will give them for free. At least no one outside their league.

I mean, it does need to be legalised to protect the women who choose to engage in sex work, but I don’t think incels are going to treat them with any respect...

Also these folks have plenty of opportunities to save some money fly to somewhere that prostitution is legal and engage a sex worker in their craft. THEY don’t because it not actually about the sex, it’s about “getting what they are owed” in their warped view of women.

A lot of them have absolutely no social skills, their entire understanding of others behaviour and social dynamics comes from movies and television, their entire understanding of sex comes from internet porn videos. I read Eliot Rogers manifesto, there is no way his social interactions were normal. His interactions…

From what I’ve heard, incels would never be interested in sex workers. They call women who have sex with anyone else but them “cum-dumpsters” and “roasties” (because apparently a woman who has a lot of sex have labia that look like roast beef.) They hate women, but desire their bodies. No logic in misogyny.

I said this some where else but his theory is proven correct by the total lack of violence towards women who are involved in long term and or married relationships. Yep, he nailed that one.

These fellas don’t consider prostitution an acceptable substitute for the high quality submissive lingerie model astrophysicist virgins they deserve.

This is why I wish sex work and sex workers weren’t so stigmatized. I’ve long thought sex work needs to be legal, regulated, unionized, and taxed.

If we’re going to be ruthlessly efficient about this like he wants, just develop a cultural norm where all the incels ship off to their own little island. Then they can’t kill any women. Problem solved.

I read that NYT article. As a Torontonian, I’d like to slap JP. Then I went to see RBG, and felt much, much better. Here’s a little palate-cleanser