blah8
Blah8
blah8

There's almost no difference between .mov and .mp4.

That sounds about right, haha. There are those service doors between about every other ticket machine along the walls.

Letting Kojima know that his fans will be fine with him working on his own, non-Metal Gear projects is the point of the phrase "Kojima doesn't have to make Metal Gear anymore." In other words, we just don't want him to be forced into making MG games just because they've sold well in the past and Konami wants him to;

What "it" are you referring to? I made a few statements there...

Sure. It is also unquestionably a videogame.

Whoa. Yeah, that's bordering on seizure-inducing...

Harley's also an internet celebrity, so at worst I'd think it would be beneficial to keep him in just for the publicity... but I guess they already have enough of that.

Indeed.

You could sign your name with some sort of calligraphy style, I guess. There's also those hanko name stamps for classic artwork and official business documents, etc..

The odd-numbered MGS games have been a bit more coherent narratively, at least in my experience. I'd play MGS(1) and MGS3 for a clearer storyline (and stronger female characters).

Now playing

Ouch, this can't bode well for that team. Ubisoft must have either not liked the direction the game was headed at all, or they just don't give a crap about its timely release...

I took the tranq rifle as my first weapon, too. I just happened to find a stun gun a long the way (or bought one... I can't remember) and it's been endlessly useful ever since.

When I took Barrett on the first time, I had saved up a number of Praxis Points in case I came across something unexpected. I ended up throwing all of them into my optical cammo and another battery. The time I finally beat him, I just blasted him with the assault rifle directly in the head for one whole clip and shot

Ah, Cobaltios must be booting his entire system off of a flash memory card, of course!

To further contextualize his labeling of "game of the year," you'd have to read the article Ebert linked.

Ah, ok - thanks for the insight.

Congrats! Reppin the Crest of Sincerity, I see :-P

Ah right, I'd forgotten about the AF-100 — it's definitely one of the best deals you can get in that price range. I agree that once you get up around the $3k+ range the argument for a DSLR solely for more prosumer-level video becomes less convincing.

Hmmm, oddly, my first and only Platinum came from Fallout 3/GotY Ed....

I'm more interested in the non-rumored 70D, myself.