bladerunner060
DoctorMoonSmash
bladerunner060

You can tell a lot about a person by how they treat people they don’t have to be “nice” to. Even if he was good to his family and friends doesn't mean he would be to strangers. Someone said on another article, that he wasn't well liked by a few of his teammates and people he went to college with. They weren't

xoJane is completely bonkers now. Every other article is bizarre clickbait-y weirdness. And people think Jezebel has drama, but xoJane’s comments sections takes it to the next level.

I think it pretty much boils down to being a lunatic or a hypocrite. If you really, truly believe that God exists and he gave you the Bible, you can either 1. Follow every weird, hateful, bizarre thing it says to do, and yes, even the New Testament has plenty (making you a lunatic) or 2. Pick what you want to follow

That’s interesting that you bring that up. On my journey from “born-again Christian” to atheist, one of my stops was the one you just described. Jesus gives us some pretty clear instructions about how we’re supposed to live, and how could I call myself a Christian if I wasn’t willing to follow some of the most basic

“While Carolyn [had] told him in the past that she wanted to die, she [had] never asked him specifically to kill her.”

I mean, Paleo’s cool and all, but Go Plio or Go Home, man.

i don’t think “spoiler candidate” can apply in a two-person primary race

Anyone who runs for President will have an effect on that election and will get a portion of the blame for the outcome. You play the game, you accept the consequences. You can try to shift the blame or play word games with it, but society doesn’t give a shit. “Should” does not come into play. Nader is a persona

This is a reasonable and correct take and has no place in Kinja.

I’m fine with Bernie staying in the race to accumulate votes and show Democrats that there is broad, national support for a progressive agenda. I am not alright with him staying in the race in a desperate bid to win.

I don’t understand this joke of “haha where’s the clit.” Like, it’s right there. ITS RIGHT FCKING THERE ARE YOU BLIND? Actually if you are blind you should still be able to find it. Because it’s right there.

I’ve mentioned her before, but one of my wife’s 3 living relatives is a retired nun. She lives in an assisted living facility in New Jersey now, and she is absolutely LIVID about all this birth control nonsense. Like, she acknowledges that it’s a component of the Catholic faith, but cannot figure out “What gives a

Not mutually exclusive, but hypocritical if you think he did it and still contribute to the wealth and prestige that has allowed him to get away with it.

I honestly want to know why people still defend him, no matter what. Seriously, his films outside of Annie Hall aren’t even good enough to warrant the “well, he’s a great artist!” defense.

We just need Hannibal Buress to make a joke about Woody Allen. Then the shit will hit the fan.

Perfectly legal contact like the nanny finding him with his face in Dylan’s crotch?

My feeling is that a) Allen is still considered a prestige director (for reasons I don’t get) and b) there are a lot of other nasty secrets (Bryan Singer, Harvey Weinstein, off the top of my head) and once you show you’ll talk about one the rest get nervous and so you could end up ousted pretty quick.

I’m going to lay it out as simply as I can for you: As far as I know, his parental rights were terminated. Do you understand what it takes to have parental rights terminated? This is something the Supreme Court says is a CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT of all Americans. As such, it’s virtually IMPOSSIBLE to have parental rights

The thing is it almost seems as if Allen has something on studio execs. He was making films, that’s true, but really he was pottering around New York usually sticking to the same female lead for several movies then suddenly this scandal breaks and he has a new movie, filmed all over the place, with a slew of stars,