That’s... a *good* movie to you?
That’s... a *good* movie to you?
I feel like Chevy Chase had a handful of good movies, and by “handful” I mean “Fletch and its sequel, and the Lampoon Vacation movies”.
I mean, that’s a fair point vis-a-vis the people who defend even after the evidence is leaked, but overall, letters defending abusers on nebulous “I haven’t seen the evidence but I know they’re innocent” grounds should always be condemned, and are always the same, so I don’t really see why it’s worth pointing out; you…
Not to be pedantic and I think we agree completely, but wouldn’t that situation also be a subordinate? Just not a direct subordinate.
There’s nothing maternal about what she was saying. And, just to be clear, he says:
How is that different than any other shitty defense-of-abuser letter?
Don’t. Fuck. Or. Try. To. Fuck. Subordinates.
The bury your gays trope has roots in the fact that older pulp stories *couldn’t* have gay characters *unless* they came to a bad end for their “sins”. Often the one who “corrupted” the protagonist, who can now live as a sad sexless monk.
I don’t think telling her to move her racist ass is ableist. Telling her to move because she gets anxious-to-the-point-of-not-functioning around people is (arguably) ableist (I mean...is telling people with pacemakers to not stand next to microwaves ableist? At a certain point, it’s a brute fact), but I fell like that…
Paramedics rushed to a local hospital and performed surgery.
They aren’t? How odd, he’s got a dog license.
Meanwhile my chihuahua just squats 90% of the time. I question whether they considered other alternative answers besides “lying”.
Hoo, boy, I know the comments here are going to be a shitshow. And I’m not going to defend these medics.
So.... the settlements should be "whatever you fucking want", right?
Does e make clear e uses Spivak? It seems pretty trivially obvious that someone might think it a typo otherwise, and “correct” it, no?
If only there were a word for adhering to the Enemies of the US, giving them Aid and Comfort as they wreck our elections....
So you’re 100% sure, so therefore they don’t get to make their own choice. You still don’t see that as incredibly patronizing and dishonest?
That is a shockingly good metric.
You’d still be depriving her of the choice, and that’s rather the problem. “Oh, I was sure of what you’d do, so therefore I made the choice for you” is patronizing as fuck, especially when it’s about something big like “whether the relationship should continue”.
I hated 2049. It was one of the prettiest SF movies I’d seen in a long time. It was wonderfully shot and the worldbuilding was amazing.