Says the lying bigot who has reached a point where they can’t even try to make a coherent argument (or, if I’m being optimistic and hoping that no one is as terrible, dishonest, and foolish as you’re presenting yourself to be, the troll who has lost interest).

Took you this long to come up with “Other factors must be present”? It’s almost like what I’ve been saying from the beginning is that it doesn’t generally, but that people can respond differently in certain circumstances! Oh wait, that’s exactly what I said. YOU, however, claimed it couldn’t in response (“Morphine…

First, you mean “depressant rather than stimulant”, or “excitatory/inhibitory”, but again, you’re not actually competent to have a discussion on this—and neither’s directly relevant to whether it’s potentially hallucinogenic per se. We are not talking about “normal” response here—because as I’ve said several times,…

So, your answer is that morphine does not produce hallucinations—your long-winded, unwarrantedly arrogant answer in which you demonstrate that Google University still isn’t an accredited school for a reason.

It’s very clear who’s full of shit here. It’s also clear that you won’t answer a simple question, because you don’t have an answer you like.

I mean, yes, I agree wholeheartedly, since the original is racist garbage so giving a movie about a slave rebellion the same title is just the right shade of fuck you. But do you think it’s too late for that to be successfully reappropriated?

No, I didn’t read your whole description. I’m not your copyeditor, and I actually KNOW what dissociation is an what class morphine belongs to etc. Because I actually have the training in the subject. And I’m not going to read it now because it’s not my job to educate you, nor am I inclined to because it’s not as…

Since what you said was either trivial stuff you copied from google or, where you made relevant points here, lying nonsense, all I’ve “learned” is that you’re trying really hard to make a valid point that justifies your arrogant bigotry, but you’re failing pretty hard. But, again, keep trying! A thousand monkeys at a…

“Ok, dude, so here we go, let’s have our fun talk of the day. I will of course ( if you had any doubt) describe what an incompetent/impostor you are.

I am amused at how desperately you’re trying to exculpate yourself for the inaccurate and stupid things you have been saying all along for the sole misogynistic purpose of casting doubt on this woman’s testimony. But I won’t let you off the hook, dude. You’re an impostor and you know it.

Hey, you finally learned how to quote! I stand corrected on the use of criminal complaint. Doesn’t excuse your previous lies, or the ones here. Strictly speaking, that’s a misuse of criminal complaint on the older articles, because the complaint properly speaking is what the prosecutor files and, prior to them…

“How stupid can you be? They are a life and death items (and therefore CONTROLLED) because they can cause death.”

“As I told you, my sister is a doctor and she laughed when I asked her if she needs a nurse to hand her over medicine in the hospital. She said that the entire hospital would be paralyzed and patients would die left and right if the process was restrictive for doctors to obtain medicine for patients.”

“You, idiot, are advocating that a woman’s testimony should not be taken at face value, even though it is always considered evidence in any sexual assault lawsuit.”

“Innocent until proven guilty is valid in the court of justice, but people are making their own opinion about a case based on the information they have. Just like OJ Simpson who is guilty of murder in my opinion and in the public opinion, regardless of what 12 jurors have decided. He remained a pariah in society, as…

“You are wrong when you say that people can’t remember anything if they are under the influence of drugs.”

I don’t assume women are lying about sexual assault—and nowhere did I say I did. So pretending otherwise is just as problematic as when you misrepresented the facts we had earlier, when you said he’d been charged but he wasn’t. I said that, at present, we don’t have much information. We do have the information that…

I never said it DID happen with any more frequency than other crimes, so why you’d respond as though I did is very confusing. I believe for several reasons that it happens way way less than for other crimes. That doesn’t mean it never happens. Nor does it mean that we should simply take every report of anything we…

You can believe whoever you want to believe. My point is that assuming before you have information and on information that, at the time we started this discussion, was outright false, is unprincipled and nonsensical. You still haven’t explained how you pick who to believe—becuase I don’t think you actually have a…

“There is enough information for the prosecutors to charge this man, but apparently not enough for you.” So, every time the prosecutors charge someone, they’re guilty as far as you’re concerned? Does that hold in ALL cases?