Congrats - that’s exactly what I said. That is the trade that was made for the modern world. If you don’t like that trade then the template is still fresh - ask the Amish if you need a clue.

Another comment based on ‘feelings,’ and rooted in confirmation bias. Remember that the UK case was Depp v. the Rupert Murdoch global media empire. Intelligence UK has researched the extensive failings of the UK justice system, you can read more here:

As someone who did experience domestic abuse, I kindly deny the request for me to “f off” thank you. And I don’t say it gleefully. It is painful and this trial has resurfaced a lot of emotional turmoil which I thought I had processed through already. This trial made Johnny Depp look kind of unappealing to be honest.…

No you can fuck off with your ignorant black and white views of the world

The UK trial was entirely different and Judge Nicol has several conflicts of interest regarding The Sun newspaper. They allowed Heard’s ‘therapist notes’ which are hearsay and at great risk of being falsified documents. They still have not been proven to be bonafide therapist notes and her hand writing is eerily…

Nope. The juror cited many reasons for not finding Heard credible, including dishonesty and altering photographic evidence. You would know that if you bothered to read what the juror actually said, instead of reading a biased second-hand account. You could also take the time to review evidence and testimony presented…

Oh give it a rest. She lied, repeatedly, on the stand, about stuff she didn't need to lie about. Juries can rule on their credibility based on perjuring yourself in front of them.

The most sexist people I’ve ever meet were women. When are you going to get married? When are you going to have a baby? You’re not a real woman until you have children. Men never say that shit.

I don’t think this at all. It was strange how she could not shed a tear (one tabloid edited a tear on to her face using a picture used by other outlets that showed in the original photo she did not have a tear), and her acting coach said this was an issue with her acting.

I figured her appeal would have fewer billables because of a stronger case for appeal, but go ahead and call me names I guess.

Because that’s not what the juror said. Someone changed his statement. Actual quote:

What you’re missing is that she accused him of sexual assault. Something that you would be aware of if you had watched the trial. Footage of the actual trial is available to watch, you don’t have to rely on biased opinion pieces and comments.

I tend to think what people objected to was Heard trying to play out a victim/abuser narrative when it felt like they were both part of an unhealthy relationship and both as guilty.

No, Heard lost because she was the abuser, and not the victim. Depp is the one who lost the tip of his finger. Depp is the one with black eyes in photos. Heard even admitted to punching him on tape. The jury got it right!

At this point it just feels like you a deluding yourself. Virtually nobody believed her, including a huge percentage of women (which I’m sure you will explain away as internalised misogyny).

Why was she rude and sarcastic and aggressive when recalling the same events in her divorce deposition? It’s not about her “acting” like a victim it’s that her evidence was tampered with, she repeatedly lied, everyone on the stand bar amber and her sister corroborated what depp had said. The audio corroborated wheat…

I like a tangy, salty, WET italian sub/grinder (extra O&V, S&P, & herbs,,please). This seems to fit the bill better than most.

We are all a little dumber for even hearing about this. Eff this planet.

That....that just looks like an Italian sub between ciabatta bread.

Also, calling it a SANDO when it’s not from a Japanese 7-11 feels like cultural appropriation.

Honestly, that isn’t much different than any “Italian” sandwich, just bigger.