I thought that the convention coverage with the live approve-o-meter and the (loaded) poll questions was engaging. I mean, me and my friends are already going to be playing a drinking game for the debates, why not add some Xbox to it?

Hey, it's another one of those posts where Mario just pasts up some dumbass picture he thought was cool from Google Image Search.

Brought to you by Lifetime Network.

U mad?

Just spit water all over my screen. Thanks?

The new Gizmodo: bitching about things nobody cares about, beating 15 articles out of said bitching.

Well I'm not saying proprietary cables aren't bullshit, because I mean, they totally are, but it does make good business sense. There's a reason Apple stock is $700 a share.

Having personally lost an iPhone 4 due to a knockoff power adapter, I'll pay the premium, thanks.

Integrated graphics for graphics? Tell me more. But, this time, proofread it.

I'm a dead horse, and I fucking love getting beaten! Hit me in the face please!

Well I'm sure they'd love to buy an $800 tablet that only runs metro apps.

How many companies do you think there are that want to encourage tablet-based work? 2? 3?

I learned how to use the Start screen correctly, but I got tired of it after I realized I was clicking "Desktop" about 200% more often than anything else. But shipping an OS that routinely kills certain SSDs? That's a show-stopper.

There's hardly any more of that dead horse left to beat. Let it go.

Start the anger machine!

Right. And yet Gizmodo has repeatedly claimed it's a lock-down chip and it's being parroted by the commenters. Remember when Gawker Media used to drive traffic by having worthwhile articles instead of hyperbolic invective?

There's still no real evidence of what that chip in the cable actually does, right?

This sounds terrifying. "Sorry, the application Brakes (process com.chevrolet.drivetrain.brakes) has stopped unexpectedly. Please try again."

The New (Old?) Gizmodo: Whine whine whine.