Maybe you should read the dozens of responses to people who have said the same thing as you to whom I’ve already responded instead of wasting my time. I was hardly rude to you with what you’ve observed is a one word response. But your feeling of entitlement to my energies could easily be called, well, rude.
BIVYg
bivyg
False.
Well, I guess you know better than the IARC.
Yup. I know what it says. It’s why I posted it. This isn’t about whether there is “proof” wifi causes cancer. It’s about the precautionary principle.
What does that mean “no actual policy effects?” What are you talking about?
there’s no physical basis for it
I’m actually not at all. Everyone is projecting anger about an argument I’ve never made.
Yup. We are in complete agreement. So what’s your issue?
Ok. Thanks for wasting everyones time.
Well, oh master of rhetoric, what do you call it when you attribute a motive to someone you’re arguing against in order to gain rhetorical leverage? Sorta like a strawman. I’m sure you have just the right word for it.
What are you talking about?
I mean, that’s not what happened. But live your truth.
Well, a person on the interent said it so it must be so. You’re much more reputable than the World Health Organization and IARC.
So ... you are a small and pathetic person. Gotcha.
Wow. You can’t even get that one right. You can’t accuse me of setting a strawman if I offer a hypothetical “I suppose” in an attempt to frame my own understanding of your argument, and ask you directly to tell me what you are, in fact, arguing — which you still haven’t done. Because there is no reasonable argument…
I actually am a historian of science, which makes me very uncomfortable with your lack of skepticism. The International Agency for Reseasrch on Cancer considers non ionizing radiation a potential carcinogen.
That isn’t a logical fallacy. It’s a truism that doesn’t mean much, but it’s not a fallacy. I’m only taking that position to reveal the absurdity of yours.
Nor am I assuming any danger. So what exactly are you arguing against? Do you think I’m arguing that Wifi is harmful? Because I’m not. There’s obviously no proof of that, as all my links have said.
Yup. Lots of natural radiation. No one is disputing this. Do you even know what you’re arguing against?