Yes real questions. Some of them were answered with “this isn’t a concern.” Some were answered with “this is a concern — lets space out vaccination schedules.” Some haven’t been answered.

Yes, she did:

The actual quote makes it clear that people had questions which had been answered (e.g. discovering that that mercury is not harmful and that regardless, it had been removed.” At no point did she say those concerns were legitimate. So what exactly do you have issue with? Nothing. You forgive Clinton and persist in…

I mean, I did. And that was a mistake. (Vaccines did contain mercury, mercury is harmful to humans, but the type in vaccines was never shown to be harmful.)

Ok. So she pandered. And Hillary pandered in a much more dangerous way. They both have revised their comments identically. So what’s the issue?

You’re right. I quoted a bad source re the mercury. What’s your point?

What is the lie? I am fully aware that thiimerosal was never shown to be harmful. But it also wasn’t necessary, and was removed. So why is that a problem?

Wait, am I fucking myself or humping Jill Stein? I’m already ahead of you with the former, but the latter requires consent, so no gurantees.

You’re right. Clinton has pandered to anti-vaxxers. And I think she would be a terrible president. I don’t think she has a medical degree though. Dr. Jill Stein does, however. From Harvard Medical school. So I’m going with her, her strong support of vaccines, and her nuanced understanding of the potential harms…

1) Stein is not a shitty candidate.

Distrust of vaccines is not reasonable.

I’m actually not. All I’m doing is pointing out that she is not an antivaxxer. But you’re so defensive your candidate and her obvious flaws that you’ve jumped to conclusions. I dont care if you don’t like Stein or if you simply prefer Hillary. But resorting to lies just makes your candidate, and her historical love of…

I can too. But many of my people can’t. They don’t have that luxury.

No. I didn’t cut anything out. You asked for the declarative statement. I gave you that statement. I think the full remarks are even better insofar as they demonstrate a nuanced and informed view of the issue —unlike Clinton’s dog whistle.

Ah there’s that classic Clinton supporter pivot!

You said you personally think 10% of Bill’s sexual partners were rape, but you think it’s ok because somehow Hillary didn’t know about these — even when several instances of sexual misconduct because national news?

You’re just wrong.

With that “fuck off” at least your tone is consistent. LOLZ at trying to take some kind of high road. Re read your comment. You showed yourself. But good to know you’re still solidly all up in your feelings.

Yes exactly! And if someone is sexually harassing you you just just tell them to stop! Going to higher ups is pointless!

“Oh peasants! Don’t you know that your vote that you just fought for doesn’t really matter! Political power is meaningless! Don’t worry your poor little heads with these national elections. Exclusively work on a grass roots level and that the big boys and girls take care of the presidency.”