I'm pretty sure the stage you're in has no bearing on what shape to expect next. I don't believe the square stages favours squares in any way.

If someone who hasn't finished the game can actually infer the meaning of that picture you've included, it's actually one the hugest end game spoilers imaginable.

You're welcome to go download SMNC, but I should give you fair warning: it is, unfortunately, one of those free-to-play games where somehow the entire community just migrated on to some different free-to-play game, and now there are at most about 200 people online at any one time, which isn't exactly a healthy…

Yeah, that's a good comparison. I've never liked Peanuts that much, but I can still appreciate that it offered a more self-reflective viewpoint regarding life than, say, Family Circus or Beetle Bailey or basically every other newspaper comic prior to 1980.

I get your point, but for every one developer that did that right, there were about 100 developers that were total shit at making their puzzles anything but obtuse and indecipherable. Like, Fez and Dark Souls are cool and everything, but would you really have enjoyed those games if you had to solve every single…

That's a rather simplistic way of looking at it.

Yeah, "...a new documentary that's raising money on Kickstarter." is pretty hard to defend. That's very clearly present tense, as if the Kickstarter is still running.

Most of what I was going to say has already been said by FrayedKnot, Fullthrottle2001, Daniel Ramos, and ch3burashka.

-List all 4 singleplayer games that have a well implemented social element

I thought it was kinda bad. The combat system is the same as Lords of Shadow/God of War, and that just DOES NOT work on a vertical 2D plane. It just doesn't fit in a sidescrolling game. The combat system makes sense on a horizontal plane (like in most battles in Lords of Shadow/God of War), but it just felt like…

I just don't get why people want HD upgrades of games that already exist. That game already exists! And you likely own it! It baffles me that people are excited for a company to make an easy buck off a product they made years ago, instead of wanting just the new game.

Haha, goddammit, that is good.

Hahahahaha, the knife.

But the plot in DX:HR was kind of bad/nonexistent, though it did have some strong characters in David Sarif and Hugh Darrow. The gameplay and art design were by far the more enjoyable aspects of the game; the specifics of the story were kind of just bland.

Unless you naturally gesture a lot when speaking (due to the family/culture that raised you), most people have a poor idea of what to do with their arms while speaking on a stage until they are coached on what to do.

Can we all agree that Risk is just complete horseshit that doesn't deserve its place in the board gaming pantheon at all? It got grandfathered in because it's so goddamn old, but there's nothing interesting about its game design, and it takes about 6 times longer to finish than any board game ever should.

Really, a vast majority of comedy is based on the incongruities you're talking about, or really, most comedy that isn't based entirely on slapstick or the shock value of vulgarity.

The original Modern Seinfeld was occasionally funny. This video game version is not even remotely funny, because it doesn't fit that any of the characters would play these games.

I think Quinton Flynn has always voiced Raiden terribly.

Really? Website redesigns drive me away all the time. Website design is a joke right now, and most people in the profession should lose their jobs. Kotaku is terrible and I barely comment here anymore. iTunes is terrible, but I'm sadly forced to use it. Facebook redesigns itself so often I don't bother relearning how…