birdoprey2
BirdOPrey
birdoprey2

Logically, does it make sense that the founders would want to arm the citizenry such that they could either just start killing one another or overthrow the newly formed government?

That’s arguable; you can argue whether Heller was decided correctly, and I’m not a fan of Scalia, but that opinion details how 2A had been interpreted and applied from the time the Bill of Rights was adopted and then for a long time after and it’s hard to argue that it’s not correct.

Kind of like we conquered Mogadishu with our incredible military prowess?

You should read this:

There’s also a huge black market for guns and, obviously, criminals can get their hands on them. If, like this asshole in Texas, someone has a family squabble and decides to shoot up a church, I don’t think they’d have too much problems finding a weapon to do it with.

As someone that rakes his yard, I myself have felt a strong desire to beat the living shit out of those that don’t because then their leaves end up in my yard and I have to rake them.

Do they have a right to finish their sentence in a halfway house or was that simply a program that once existed that now doesn’t because the halfway houses folded?

Ever since Gawker died and this place was taken over by Univision it’s become a pure propaganda site. The old Gawker leaned left, but at least it was funny as hell. Now? Not so much.

The fact you follow a religion that compels you to wear those fucking beards and cover women head to toe is all the evidence I need to know you’re fucked in the dothead.

Why? Because I’m linking you to the same article that the author did?

You should at least correct your grammar in your comment if I’ve reduced you to posting it over and over already.

Yes, please do see above.

You said I wouldn’t respond to any suggestions and you won’t mention the only realistic one available to you.

Hi Scotty! How’s your butt hurt today?

Bleach has no purpose but to kill things as do many other chemicals either individually or when combined with others.

Why are you avoiding the only realistic option available to you?

Do you know why it reached that conclusion?

If you had secession on that scale, you’d (a) have to guarantee that all military branches would go along with it (b) that everyone in the military would go along with it and (c) that you could remove all military hardware currently in those states so it couldn’t be used defensively. I’m willing to bet that at least

Well, you haven’t mentioned the only realistic remedy available to you which is repealing the Second Amendment. Why don’t you try that?

Any tool is a weapon if you hold it right. The Palestinians have been using every day items to kill people and don’t need guns to do so.