Not a false equivalency, but I take your point.

It is, in San Fransisco!

From the article her family’s warning was that she hated youtube, not exactly, “Our daughter is unhinged and will probably go to youtube headquarters and shoot people”

See here’s the thing, her family members told cops she was missing and she hated youtube. They found her sleeping in her car, what else should they do? Should we start detaining everyone who publicly states they dislike a company? Do you realize what type of violations of personal rights and freedoms that would create?

You lost me at locking up brown people and ex-boyfriends.

Implying that they were the most violent. Now that I broke contradictory facts to equation I guess you’ll just refuse to engage it.

Standard procedure really.

I did say White people, we all know men are innately more violent than women. So ok, whose more violent? White men who have made up anywhere between 40% to 35% of the population (going back 35 years) to have been involved in 75% of mass shootings or 6% of black men being responsible for 50% of murders going back…

More than 70% of the victims in the last 35 years were at the hands of white men. But wait, what’s your point again?

The social media disease—it’s got nobodies all over thinking they’re entitled snowflakes.

Reasonable suspicion has to include more than another person making claims. You need more evidence to hold someone against their will.

Could you imagine how it would be spun if the government actually had the power to lock up people they deem as mentally unstable.

Too bad it wasnt the Buzzfeed office

Is she going to say “yes I am dangerous?” Are we going to empower the police to detain her on the word of a family member or their own discretion? There aren’t easy answers

Is March 31th similar to March 31st?

I’m not going to go back through every instance of this site reporting on something like this and provide links. If you browse this site even occasionally, you know exactly what I’m talking about.

There’s not much they can do with her. They made contact with her sleeping in her car. No threat was determined. If they would have arrested her for that people would be decrying her civil liberties were violated.

No, I’m saying this website’s timbre in addressing gun violence carries a much more, shall we say, eager tone, when the perpetrator is a white male.

I’m only here to say one thing:

I don’t think it’s wrong to point out hypocrisy. It’s especially useful in bubbles like this one. But like I said, I’d say it’s even a step forward for this website to even acknowledge something like this.

They will never let facts interfere with their narrative.