So you’re going to mandate someone buy an insurance policy that doesn’t insure against anything? WTF? I can sell that right now for one cent. If I don’t ever have to pay out on a loss, I can’t lose money. Getting around that requirement is simple.

1A - Westboro Baptists disagree.

You can’t formulate a response so you’re going to run away instead. If you had a decent response, you’d not hesitate to offer it.

Yes, I read it the first time. Doing any of the things you propose would accomplish nothing. We have hundreds of millions of guns in the country already. Outfitting every new one with features most people wouldn’t pay extra for does nothing.

Don’t worry, you can’t help it you’re retarded.

You already banned “assault weapons” once. How did that go? Do you want a second chance at it since it worked out so well the first time?

Unless the military decides to simply wipe out entire segments of the US population indiscriminately, it won’t be able to bring the full weight of its military arsenal anywhere in the US. It’ll be, if anything, worse than insurgent fighting because there will be no way to determine who is on which side.

Are you trying to be the stereotypical liberal that gets overly emotional right off the bat? The Pediatrics article the author linked to is actually very interesting. If you’d read it, you’d know.

You have to be Nancy Pelosi’s retarded son.

You may want to look up the 9th Circuit’s tendency to get overruled.

So you plan to set up bollards at every single access point for autos?

If they are, I’m sure you’re just the guy to point it out to me. Give it a shot, champ.

So what have you accomplished by bitching about it? Have you managed to decrease gun violence?

I don’t know. Since guns are readily available, I think people use them instead. The Columbine killers tried to use explosives but they didnt’ go off.

You’re correct, and I agree with you on foreign wars. LeMay may have been a little out there, but his “bring everything to bear or don’t go to war” is a policy we should still be following, in my opinion.

Yeah, I think we’ve always had laws prohibiting people from using a motor vehicle to run others down. Similarly, we’ve always had laws prohibiting people from loading vehicles with explosives and parking them outside buildings, but that doesn’t prevent them from happening and it’s what people that don’t have access to…

Your use of simple math has stunned the commenters into silence.

Stop making it plain you want to be the left’s version of a FOX news viewer and only want to give airtime to people you agree with. Come out of your bubble, son.

“. . . people should be required to carry insurance for each of their firearms.”

And the Second Amendment.