See, Now THAT’S fucking hilarious. Netflix profiting on the whole debacle.

Gawker tried to bully someone and learned that when the financial playing field is equaled that the party who did something wrong can lose. Gawker did something wrong. Gawker lost.

But seriously, that’s not a burpee.

I thought we’d see her burping for an hour...

I agree with you that women have an unfair eye cast upon them when working out, but this is an awful representation of what a burpee is to most people (including me). If this meets Guiness’ criteria, then their definition sucks. I and most people I know adhere to the Spartan Race’s burpee rules:

I gotta agree with the “haters”. If you’re arms don’t go up (and most people jump) at the end then that’s not a burpee. While it’s still awesome she did that many I don’t think she should get the record for this half assed attempt.

It’s almost like his administration is filled with regime change hard-liners who genuinely want Iran to build a nuke so they can have an excuse to invade and steal Iran’s shit.

-Sorry if this is a bit unrelated but I just have to vent about this:-

As an IO9 reader (and as someone who is becoming less of one), you know what I like the least? The continual race/gender/orientation-baiting.

Don’t you guys ever get tired of playing the victim? You took a series of sites that, mostly, delivered quality content in their areas of interest and turned them into some of the worst click bait, agendized, and SJW-pandering garbage on the internet. I will be sad to see certain writers go (very few, to be sure), but…

Sounds like you guys are racists. It couldn’t possibly be that some cultures decidedly prop up mediocrity, corruption and nepotism. No, that’s impossible. All cultures are equal and you know it. To criticize Univision in this way, it must be because your white privilege is showing. Has nothing to do with incompetent…

“...offering laughably thin connections to sports...”

Remember when it was cool to take cheap shots at Buzzfeed? You know, before they got a Pulitzer nod? Here’s a hot take - maybe if Jezebel spent less time on indulgent performance-art, or if Jalop stopped talking about politics altogether, or if AV Club hadn’t been decimated by the GMG formatting, you wouldn’t have to…

I love the various GMG sites, except when the instinct for provocation is counterproductive to the goal of staff and the readership, which is preservation of the entity. This headline was an amazingly stupid choice, and it distracts from the valuable content.

tl;dr-summary:

Man, you guys have some cojones. I hope your new employer appreciates them.

So viewership is down because of an aging population? Weird, people always say the opposite of Fox News, that the older demographic is the reason they have such better ratings than other liberal news channels.

Looks like the “What were you thinking?!” award is going to be decided early this year.

It’s like the screenplay for Gigli.

“A shark-obsessed boss...”