The fact you seem like a dick to people does not mean you’re incorrect, though. Sometimes the most truthful statements are the most dick-ish.

Moskowitz’s coverage of the first trial was top-notch. It was the best around. As she relayed what happened, I think that this is a very tough case for the prosecution.

So you’re OK with prostitution in “theory” but not as it exists? Or are you cool with it as actually practiced in reality, not theory?

What Keillor was alleged to have done differs from the Man Show in that it wasn’t serial misogyny peddled for dollars on TV.

How are things in Gitmo today, Jihadist?

Amendment #2 while it made sense at the time, does it make sense now?

I understand you’re OK with misogyny so long as consent is given - so you’re cool with prostitution and the like - and that’s where the line is drawn. I just don’t agree with that take on it.

Klebold and Harris managed to hit, and kill, plenty of people using 9mms.

A 45 Long Colt, .454 Casull, .455 Webley, etc will do more damage than an AR-15 all day long.

Right, but look at the incidents described:

I can happily agree to disagree with you as you make your point well. But I do want to clarify that you seem to be operating under the belief that Keillor was accused by “dozens” of women. That’s not accurate. One woman accused of him doing “dozens” of inappropriate things over a long period of time.

The problem with that is that most guns are semi-auto. Practically every handgun, many shotguns, pretty much every rifle that’s not bolt-action or an antique.

Human trafficking is a job too but that doesn’t make it right.

I agree that there are levels of misogyny and, based on what we know now, Louis CK’s “sins” are worse than Kimmel’s jackass TV show.

It’s currently in your wife’s mouth. Once she’s done, I’ll put it back in my pants.

I don’t disagree with that. I agree with the guy upthread saying that Franken shouldn’t have been forced to resign and I also don’t think that Garrison Keillor should have been terminated.

Again, are you referring to yourself? Why do you keep doing that?

So you’re not going to answer the question.

Are you referring to yourself? If so, I don’t have a clue why you do what you do and doubt you do either.

I agree with everything you wrote but want to clarify this: