And in doing so, I’ve seen this story at least dozen times across the internet, all of which mention Kumail’s new movie.
I keep seeing that header thumbnail out of the corner of my eye and thinking you wrote an article on WCW’s Shockmaster and his infamous introduction promo.
This is a terrible take. They actually serve a much needed part of helping us talk about things without writing out entire paragraphs to describe a relatively common thing.
You’re far too late .Like, over a decade late. Language doesn’t work this way, especially on the internet.
It’s OK to offend shitty, terrible people.
Nothing about the severed head, though? I actually had to go back and look for the nipple because I thought you meant Trejo’s.
I was thinking Moebius.
Just because you made it through the whole article without mentioning it, and I know it’s not really relevant, I just have to point out that Hill’s real last name is King, as in the son of Stephen King.
I like 3 more than 2, and more than ANY of the “of Chucky” movies.
Yeah, because having differing opinions on films than someone is the same as a cult.
But he was also an objectively terrible wrestler, both in the ring and on the mic.
Punishment enough? Being as he filmed himself commiting a crime, I’d say not having the cops involved means he’s getting off incredibly easily.
Not the point, and you know it. They shouldn’t HAVE to look to find out who did it. It should be clearly stated.
Maybe the lightsabers in the movies are too powerful?
A year? He’ll be back in a month.
And maybe your defense of a dude filming himself committing criminal acts while invading people’s privacy is “based on something else.”
Saying the n-word isn’t even illegal. Filming strangers in a public bathroom is.
It made me think of Japanese companies in the 80's crediting their devs under fake names, ostensibly to fight head-hunting. Capcom’s sound programmer “Yuukichan’s Papa” was always a favourite.
See my other post.
How is leaking like 3 days earlier going to help them any more than a normal release of that information?