billingsley
BIlllington
billingsley

If it was 2008, nothing. Unfortunately, it’s not 2008.

The wingnut welfare only lasts for so long.

I wondered about this too while I was watching TLJ, having coincidentally finished playing TSL (a great game made even better with the Restored Content mod).

Individually, Haneke’s movies seem like they could be interesting but if you take his work as a whole it’s really clear he thinks he’s better than most people.

Fuck you for making that the header image.

Yeah, this is fair. It’s why I prefer Metacritic.

Maybe it seems a little facile, but like... they just collect reviews. If studios were so petrified of their garbage getting bad reviews, maybe they should start actually giving a damn about their product.

His (or his teams’) contributions to this ongoing story have been completely bewildering. The only actresses he’s denied assaulting are women of color and now this. What is his strategy? Does he have a strategy?

Also, they’re almost always a grotesque misrepresentation of what therapists actually do, and you can be sure that they’re going to get unprofessionally flustered by the extra-special, extra-unique protagonist, and you can be a million percent sure that if they’re young, hot, and the opposite sex of the protagonist,

Why is this guy so angry all the time? I hope he doesn’t think it makes him look badass because it really isn’t working.

That seems like an unusually risky story for the Enquirer to publish.

Just remember - there are millions. MILLIONS of women right now who think this is the hottest shit that’s ever been put to paper.

This is my absolute least favorite movie trope. It doesn’t really serve a useful purpose and it makes the director look unbelievably smug.

I’m very excited but I hope they write out Holden’s shitty girlfriend completely. My God that entire subplot was annoying.

Those first couple of Weezer albums are absolutely proto-Red Pill bullshit and Rivers’ lyrics really show how much of an entitled manbaby he was (is?).

No one can threaten everyone who makes false or inaccurate claims about them, though the extremely rich come closest. So what if some tiny, no-traffic blog says she’s a white supremacist (or at least, deliberately makes herself popular with them). Maybe it’s libelous, I don’t know, but that’s for a court to decide.

The way they did Ego was pretty neat.

I thought his entire death sequence was bizarrely out of character for the show. Slow-motion mauling while screaming in agony followed by a really, really long take of the monsters eating him. It seemed overly... mean-spirited somehow?

So I’m not totally up on this sort of law, but won’t Kath have to prove that Alice is lying about these claims? I could have sworn that’s how defamation worked.

I’m just glad they stepped away in S4 from the exact opposite, where only bad things happened to the main characters (seasons 1 through 3).