Chris Sacca, tech investor and noted Guy Who Throws Tantrums At Hamilton Shows,”Who invested in Uber early”

Hey! I just said “program slides”

Thank God!

Talk about fundementaliy flawed...

cool. as i said never had occasion to think about this b4. i appreciate the confirmation.

pretty.

Problem is - NASA doesn’t agree that man is accelerating sea-level rise:

Kirk should just have a picture of her in her lingerie (that he snapped in the shuttle) on his desk/phone/comminicator/wall in some random walk-by scene.

You might want o consult with the Air Force and their 2017 Budget on how identical the platform variations are. You own words from your previous post contradict your statement.

I get that but, I’m wondering - and again, I’ve never contemplated this -

HAHA - wow.

PS the parts compatibility is down to @19%.

that’s backwards thinking - everyone is replacing thier platforms with things better than they had.

On teh whole FAA permission thing, why wouldn’t it be NASA permission?

Cool.

Ok this is going on 24 hours - why don’t YOU do your homework. Look up the Air Force assesment of the platform.

So you are saying that the F35A is a purpose built Air-to-air fighter.

I hear you. That IS the design of the F35A. But, according to the Air Force Brass that isn’t how it will be deployed - it will have to be deployed in aggressive engagement where those long range sensors won’t help.

That may or may not be true. I know that is what it is capable of and what its sensor array is designed for but it will be aggressively engaging enemy fighters along with the limited numbe of F22s we have - that statement comes directly from the Air Force brass.

No.