It is much more difficult to kill someone with the next most used implement to a firearm.

exploiting. 

For starters, $125 billion of ‘defense’ spending was considered waste which could be eliminated over 5 years, according to an internal report. You are failing to consider the degree to which standard civil service admin is included in Pentagon spending. It’s a bloated institution which any good libertarian should look…

From a much lower base where firearms constituted a much less prevalent weapon used in homicides.

From a much lower base where firearms constituted a much less prevalent weapon used in homicides.

From a much lower base where firearms constituted a much less prevalent weapon used in homicides.

From a much lower base where firearms constituted a much less prevalent weapon used in homicides. 

He doesn’t understand how homicide rates work.

Four people getting shot in one sitting is unusual outside of a war. Even here, mass shootings constitute around 3% of gun homicides.

Poisonous traps. 

Maggie has her moments.

Yashar’s always been a bit of a hall monitor. 

5 word limit?

Is this a bit?

Exactly. 

No, the Armenian Genocide did happen. 

Probably.

Once again, homicide isn’t Econ 101 supply and demand, we do not see consistent rises or falls in weapons used at the expense of others in order to maintain a consistent homicide rate, unless said weapons are banned, and until the overall homicide figure reaches a point at which it seemingly cannot fall further.

More like a little more than 1/5, and yes, post ban, it understandably fell.

Over time, it will.