Personally 666 doesn't mean anything to me, but I understand some religious people consider it the sign of the devil for whatever reason they choose. It wouldn't be a big deal if the race organizers had just eliminated the number before they even started. It's no different than all the buildings that don't have a…

Holy fucking Christ that is ownage.

If it's a crime to shit down another man's throat, lock me up and throw away the key.

Worse than calling Martin a "half ni***r" was the implication Incognito made that he could get the other half on layaway.

Geez, talk about an offensive lineman, amirite?!?!

Everyone's definition of credible is different. Smart use of the word on your part so anyone who finds evidence of something you say doesn't exist can just be brushed off as "not credible" without you actually defining what that means.

There is no difference between this site and Bleacher Report, except that Bleacher actually has team scores and shit readily available. Now don't get me wrong I like Deadspin, but making fun of a company with a more organized and better website isn't really the way to go. You are a really bad editor, and there's a…

Yeah, you lot that one. No big deal, you'll get 'em next time.

You fucking killed it yesterday/today.

Goalposts have receded to a galaxy far, far away.

I do enjoy how he tried to distance Deadspin from Bleacher Report, as if there is a vast distance in quality between the two sites.

Right?! I can't believe he had to come on here to defend one of his writers before anything was actually said at that point. He knew his author was going to get destroyed because it was a shitty article and yet he still allows it to be published...why are both of them still employed?

Honestly, judging by most of the dumb shit you as an editor let through it's not as though Gawker Media (of all fucking companies), the one that is based off shore for the purposes of money laundering and tax evasion, the one that is set up very much like a drug cartel, the one who shamelessly pushes an agenda with…

Okay, yes, because some dude on the internet was not able to find someone from espn.com in the space of two minutes saying that, then anyone making this point is essentially an outlier.In a way, I can't believe that I'm having this argument, because anyone who was better than pre-verbal and not in cryogenic stasis…

I don't think it is a given that another team would have signed him.

Richie could have avoided this if he had just remained anonymous. Like, worn a disguise, or gone undercover or something. I swear there is a word for this, it's just hidden from me right now.

And yet, there are not one, but two stories on Deadspin tonight about Riley Cooper that only obliquely deal with him as a football player.

Thrown out of the NFL implies banning him from playing. Cut from his team implies cut from his team, from which point he can sign with any other team. There was a small minority saying the latter, and I'm not clicking on some random dude's tumblr to read if anyone was saying the former. But if it would come down to…

Thank you for putting words in my mouth. I took issue with your make-believe idea that people just "shrugged their shoulders and laughed," not with the idea that Cooper reaps what he sows.

The reaction to Riley was basically everyone shrugging and making fun of how shitty the Eagles receivers are; that is equal and opposite. Few stories actually play out like that.