bigmclargehuge--disqus
BigMcLargeHuge
bigmclargehuge--disqus

Clearly history's greatest monster.

That's just what a lizard space pope would WANT us to believe!

What a bunch of clowns.

Dave's not here, man.

Sayed actually wasn't just sitting there. He was interviewed by the detectives by himself (no lawyer or parents, and he was 17) for some ridiculous amount of time (like 7 hours or something) and he didn't give them any incriminating info.

A lot of it was generated by the mix up of the two cops who took him to the station thinking he is a WITNESS to the murder because the arresting officers didn't tell them much of anything when they handed him off. That's why they just planted him on the bench until the detectives got there. It was only after the

They seem pretty chill on Twitter with Kevin complimenting Trace and Mary Jo's rennfest project and helping promote the kickstarter. Would be too bad if there was bad blood behind the scenes. Maybe there is still a hangover from the Mallon schism and Trace associates Kevin with that.

For a while I thought this was headed for an Alford, but I'm starting to come around to your line of thinking.

You are completely wrong. The sole legal basis for vacating the original jury verdict is ineffectual assistance of counsel. It's right there in the opinion and order. Saying it was "less on the alleged ineffectiveness of counsel" is just completely incorrect.

Don't give "a Kurt Sutter shitfest" short shrift.

That's a huge supposition. People completely fabricate testimony all the time. His testimony is almost assuredly 100% bullshit. Whether that means he is the killer himself or was fed a narrative by the cops doesn't change the wild inconsistencies and outright nonsense that is part of his testimony. The Judge in this

If he testifies again, Sayed's lawyers will shred Jay completely. His credibility was challenged by a lawyer that was falling apart and didn't know the case well.

Your faith in Jay Wilds is hysterical considering the 7 different versions of events he has provided over the years. Guy was a squirrely petty criminal that was manipulated by the cops and has been keeping it up for 20 years to keep his sorry ass out of jail.

Dude, that was like version 7 of his story, all with multiple, multiple inconsistencies. Pinning Adnan's guilt on Jay's statement(s) is ludicrous.

Well, he's been wildly inconsistent up to and including creating a completely different story in his recent Intercept interview. The cops probably taught him the story, the prosecutors just presented it.

As to "why they did it" if you are referring to AT&T it is because they simply aren't reliable as a matter of fact. In the recent hearing they showed, in this very record, incoming calls 30 minutes apart "located" in areas that no one could reach in 30 minutes. The state called an FBI guy to rebut the argument and

They were re-victimized by a shitty police dept. and prosecutor's office which is being exposed day-by-day as a complete clusterfuck of an operation.

Ya, that is basically the entire basis for this ruling. AT&T, at the time they sent the records in 1999 basically said "Hey, these aren't reliable for determining location using incoming calls." Look at the very bottom of the cover sheet up in the story there. That little disclaimer was ignored/hidden/unknown (take

Serial was actually pretty weak on the legal issues. You shouldn't really judge this case based upon Serial at all.

It said location information was unreliable for incoming calls. The state built most of its case by using the cell phone records to track the alleged movements of Jay and Adnan (or as some think, had Jay perjure his testimony to match the records). Cell phone info wasn't even a part of this current appeal but the