biackie6169
Black
biackie6169

Cowardly actions are often a smart way to do things, but that doesn’t make them less cowardly. If you’re gonna fight someone, fight fair. Otherwise, you ain’t got shit to brag about, imo. It’s just a bad look.

You bring up some good points that are definitely worth discussing. The conversation over “leaks” in gaming journalism is an interesting one, and one we’ve discussed a LOT internally. (I sit next to Stephen, and he and I have conversations about this sort of thing ALL the time.)

Gameplay wise, he fits comfortably in most situations and team compositions, as is intended. His flexibility is a lot of fun to play.

My uncle used to tell me this story all the time about his experience with bullying during his time in HS.

Agreed. Currently it does feel very weak, legally. You’d pretty much need an amendment to copyright law. Or an amazing lawyer to find how this is a violation in current law. I mean, it could be argued that this is simply an augment to another product. Like a third-party light and magnifying glass for your gameboy, or

I’m not sure how this is going to stand up legally but, I’m happy to see Blizzard try and shut it down. My previous solution ended in an arms race between dev teams and hackers/botters. This could simplify somethings if the threat of suit is legit.

I’m not a fan of people having to go to court but, these types of

I wasn’t upset. Discussion is healthier when the importance of matters are not being presented out of proportion. As for your core argument, it’s up to you to determine if that is their job. Journalists routinely choose not to publish information that is not germane, not important, or potentially dangerous. So an

Watergate uncovered that a sitting president had his people break in to an opposition party’s offices, install bugs for spying, and harass political opponents. All of which are illegal activities. That clearly falls in the domain of investigative journalism as an important service for the greater public good.

Pissing people off isn’t doing good journalism. Informing people is doing good journalism. Going for information and appealing to smart discussions instead of clickbait is good journalism.

Not really, Fox pisses a lot of people off, doesn’t make them right.