biackie6169
Black
biackie6169

Yup, i think our believes what the press is, and should be differ. And yes i think there is a huge difference in between reporting about games and politics for example.

Yes, i believe in some way you are right. But when the spoiler has no value (i mean is it really that a win, to read the whole intro to a game in an article a year in front?) instead it hurts the publisher and game developer ... how should it be threaten? In my opinion, you should rethink what info you serve your

A) So someone robbed a bank, is chased by the police, runs around you and tosses you the money. Are you obliged to keep it then?
B) It is not, it just points out that not every info you get is worth sharing and publishing, and that you should think about consequences and the value of the info.
C) I advise you to do

I think that depends on what info you publish. Can you really say that spoiling the whole Fallout 4 intro was an article Kotaku had to publish? Was it information necessary for you?
I think the journalist should filter among the information those are relevant and need to be published and those that are not, and will

While i agree on the first part i disagree on the second. But, I also think that the info you get should be reported wisely. It should be considered what is it really that your readers need to know and what is just you spoiling their future experience and the subjects (in this case Bethesda or Ubisoft) work and


I like your site. I like the part of its focused on Anime and Comics. But the part about games gets worse, and i’m starting to get annoyed by some of the articles here. Their value and integrity is doubtful. Don’t get me wrong, i’m not a fan of hyping articles i like objectivity, but at the same time i like good