I don’t think that just because you are disabled, physically, mentally, or sensorially, you should get free lifetime access to the NPS, including everyone you stuff in the same vehicle with you! Why? Why should someone with say Type 1 get free access? Or anyone else with some sort of disability? We all pay taxes and…

Most of you, including the author of the piece, sound just as narrow-minded and bigoted as the friggin republicans...and that’s saying something. No wonder we have an idiot for a president!

He really didn’t need the publicity when this happened...he was a golden boy at that time...so, I highly doubt he was doing it for publicity. As for the rest...sure, it would be great if, since he probably has the money, he would personally take care of it...but, on the flip side, if he were to take care of it…

Very true, about the using the terms interchangeably...and the fake vests. But, it’s gotten bad enough, people are just bringing dogs in places and not even trying to pass it off anymore. I went into a $6 a latte coffee shop (in a city where pets are not allowed in places with food) recently and there was a dog, with…

No? No what? No, getting a $200,000 home for $100,000 isn't subsidized? Yes, by definition it would be. I'm not sure what "No" is referring to.

Unfortunately, most non-profit organizations are not run in a sustainable way...than again, nor are most for-profit organizations. Either way, that's life in the business world. But, it does appear the organization tried to do good, it does not appear they tried to defraud or scam or profit from this, and it appears…

The foundation is a corporate entity with a board of directors and executive management. He, I’m sure was not the sole decision maker for any of the hires.

Unless without the subsidization, those houses would be $200,000!

Habitat for Humanity does not give houses away for free! Their average mortgage is $90,000. Brad Pitt's non-profit was so much a non-profit, they don’t have any money left...so your thought it was a profit venture would not be correct.

Yeah...how did the gas meters get approved? This isn’t unincorporated Nowhereville! It’s more on the city/county inspector for passing the gas line inspection! The other issues may not be things for the inspectors, but certainly are on the GC, contractors, and architect.

You are 100% correct...and unless he intentionally pushed for subpar work and products knowing they would be faulty, he should not be named and likely will be protected by the corparate vail! But, their thought process is likely: Brad Pitt has money and should share his good fortune.

He didn't hire anyone...the organization did.

The idea, if you did the research, was to get those that lost their home into a new home as quickly as possible. Nothing was getting done in NOLA, so the MIR organization stepped in to help. They planned to build these houses quickly and green and as inexpensive as possible. They were never to be free, but they were…

That’s now how that works! Even as a non-profit, the officers and employees are protected by the corporate vail. That's the point of a corporation. Unless the officers or employees are found to have done something that breaks the Vail, they can't be help personally liable. Crappy products are sold everyday...you don't…

That has been more of an issue with “emotional support animals” than “service animals”.

That's what I said too... service dogs are not puppies. Also, as far as I know, they can't actually refuse a real service dog, regardless of age (again not that that matters since again service dogs aren't puppies!).

Nobody knows how to merge, not just Americans! 

Not entirely true. That would only be the case if the pre-marital property was in no way maintained, managed, or contributed to using marital assets. Once marital assets get introduced to non-marital assets things became grey. Think about a house that spouse A buys before getting married for 10k. Then after marriage,…

Without having all the facts, what is there to address? His first underage girlfriend’s dad was involved and didn’t have an issue with it. We don’t know if they had intercourse while underage, so we don’t know if he committed a “crime”. Furthermore, the stonger man, weaker woman comment is total B.S. and you just…

I'm sorry, but I can't fathom forgetting my child but not my computer! I think that showcases are larger issue!