Look... it’s Gina-fucking-Rodriguez, not the Dalai Lama.  Yes, she missed the mark. Ya know who else missed the mark?  Anyone who actually gave a shit.

How are people not recoginzing the obvious correlation to the American border?  I’m not saying I agree with the self-appointed border patrol gun nuts, but the logic you are employing here is the same they do.  To be true, it must be true in both places.  I certainly do not think its true at the American border, so I…

“So to recap, he unlawfully trespassed into a sovereign nation, endangered the island’s inhabitants, was justifiably perceived as a threat, then was killed in self-defense. Which they were well within their rights to do.”

It’s his first Tweet. He’s a celebrity. He probably felt it should have a proclamation feel due to it being his first and his status. Not having an actual proclamation, he likely asked himself “what do most people proclaim nowadays?”

Somebody PLEASE turn that image into a poster. It would sell better than the “OBAMA: HOPE” one.

That’s really the point, you got a problem when even the drivel is true.

That’s pretty good. It got me thinking:

So... I’ve never seen the show, but I did notice it has a 97% Rotten Tomato rating. I still can’t tell if this genuine praise for the argument or some sort of incredulity-infused criticism.

The “quite possibly actually incapable” was intended as hyperbole.  I thought that would be obvious, but the thrust of your claim is largely reasonable.

Your model is impressive. I’m not sure I completed step 4 though, and I gotta say you are way off. This is light intellectual fare, though very likely still drivel. If you want to see some equally impressive “wanna-be-intellectual drivel” with all sorts of SAT words you should check out my other posts. I make all…

It wouldn’t be possible for obvious reasons, but if it was, would it be a genuine sign of contrition if Magnuson put “Don’t Start None...” as the epithet on his tombstone?

This is John Stuart Mill in a piece on interventionism from the 19th century:

“fearful of nothing”

My response began in a prickish tone, because yours began with the “I don’t know about it, so it must not exist” assumption. You say “this needs to begin” when it has already begun. My mistake was related to not clearly identifying the “this.” Ambiguous antecedents are really the bane of clear communication.

The discussion already is happening and it began awhile ago.

Just b2b ridiculous burns.  Am I allowed to laugh or should I denounce this as bullying. I mean... this level of consecutive ownage can only be bullying.

This guy shot two people in the head, his ex-girlfriend and himself, and no one died?  

Except he has zero ownership of Kraft foods and never has had any. It’s a common mistake, but we’re in the information age, getting the actual answer is a couple clicks away.

Racist Baby was much better (more racist) this time, not gratuitously racist, but responded in kind, a big improvement from last installment’s open-minded baby.

I’m struggling with this.