As usual, this column only attracts people with the most mundane and uninteresting non-problems possible. Your girlfriend doesn’t want to throw out mementos from a previous part of her life? Well why the hell should she, just because you did?
Then we have two would-be swinger seeking a crash course in dating, you…

but my girlfriend still has boxes of old photos/wedding photos, old phones with photos, his phone number in her contacts, the old wedding ring, dress, and up until recently his last name.

Needing to dominate / destroy someone’s past because you are jealous is disgusting. This says a lot about you.

You sound like mature people in a solid relationship. Way to go.

If you think you’re able to “move on” from a significant other dying without getting rid of mementos, then there is no reason why couldn’t do the exact same thing if the relationship died and not the person.

A hook-up four months before you even knew each other? I don’t see how that’s any more a cause for concern than the fact that they were married is.

I used to be in a relationship with a guy who was divorced and had a child with the woman so she was very much a part of our lives. I wish that I had been more mature and just accepted that from the beginning. You get the person as they are, all of their past included. So the same way they talk about fun birthday…

My wife has her old wedding pics. We go through them and laugh or admire how pretty she was as a bride. Even though that first marriage didn’t last, it doesn’t change the fact that her first wedding was obviously very special for her, as it should be, and it’s not a problem.

God knows I’ve been where that first guy is, and my scumbag brain got me into trouble because of it. It’s good advice, though; don’t dance around how you feel, and don’t dance around the fact that you know it’s not a rational response. But if I can address you directly, sir, I would tell you that it’s very, very…

Especially since why would she need to know how to read to do improv? If anything, she’d be better off with improv, since then she wouldn’t have to memorize lines being read to her.

This is strangely relevant given the article about women with too good of grades that just came out.

This logic reminds me of when Chuck Todd criticized Hillary Clinton for being “over prepared” for one of the presidential debates.

Why? Well, Hunt and Ackerman think it’s because she has every scene memorized

My favorite part of the “Lea Michele can’t read” conspiracy video is when they prove that she cannot read or write because of segments she did on the Ellen show. I was cry-laughing by the time they came up with the idea that a person was sitting behind the couch writing on her dry-erase board for her.

What no one is answering is how in the world LM would have gotten to the point of auditioning or being considered for Glee without knowing how to read or write?? People think she was just read to the entire time before that? For every role?? LMAO this rumor was a winner.

Right? I hate the way it’s being portrayed as some moral failing on Lea Michelles part. Many people struggle with literacy. Kudos on marking it the butt of a joke

I guess it would be funnier if illiteracy wasn’t a fairly serious problem in this country.

I heard the once held an opponent’s wife’s hand in a jar of acid, at a party.

suggests what seems like the obvious likeliest culprit: one hinky or two different scales

I thought the 1st rule of medicine was “do no harm”, but “don’t believe accusations of assault or rape because those bitches are liars” seems like pretty much the same thing. Pretty much.