betheffessx
betheffess
betheffessx

Yes, I actually, in the fields of false negative testing and radiological error, and rare variations in uterine formation, am smarter. There is nothing wrong with admitting you know more than somebody else, it is actually crucial to going forward and treating a problem appropriately, but it is socially prosecuted

If at least one baby is alive (I know at least one is not), I am waiting to give birth, but babies with anencephaly need to be induced because they lack a normal brain that directs them to do their part in coming out autonomously. So I NEED THIS RECOGNIZED FOR WHAT IT IS. If not alive, it all needs to come out before

I mean, please keep in mind that if it's possible for Anna to write this article about me and completely omit everything that reveals that there IS something that three professionals have called an abdominal ectopic or possible ectopic pregnancy, and omit the fact that none of the doctors I've seen recognize the

I've never heard of what you're talking about, do you have any proof she is a narcissistic fantasist? I do know that two people, one of them my friend who has been on my Facebook friendlist all this time, have come to me telling me they went through the same ordeal of negative tests and what doctors were calling

Okay, here we go. Rotated so you can see clearly, you'd need to zoom in on a computer though. This one, as I have said, may very well be decaying or the ultrasound only got bone-level density mostly, but either way this fetus has anencephaly. This was the earliest of the group I posted, from 12 weeks. Oh also you CAN

Thankfully booknerd I don't need you to believe something for it to be true. You're a bully. Find better ways to spend your time than by revealing your lack of knowledge about hCG and radiological inattentional bias by being nasty to other people through the internet, perhaps gain some actual knowledge yourself and

The article is well-written as a constructed story meant to serve a storyline of pseudocyesis, which is not what is going on here. This is real life not a neatly tied, sad story about a fictional deluded naive autistic person and the real situation is not what she is making it out to be by omitting my ultrasounds, the

Yeah, I've said that. I posted elsewhere the relevant excerpt:

"Falsely low or false-negative results can occur when an extremely high level of substrate overwhelms the assay system. If the concentration of the antigen is sufficiently high to saturate, both the solid migratory phase and fixed detection antibodies

No, that is absolutely false. I'm not sure if you've viewed my full set of ultrasounds. The baby with anencephaly and the two brain hemispheres bulging out is clearly in the uterus, yet high at one end of it. High at one end of it is not "in the uterine wall." There are two other sac IN THE UTERUS, one of which

They said I had left ovarian cysts, which doesn't explain the fetuses consistently showing up in my uterus.

These people aren't smart. They're bullies. They come into contact with someone who knows more than them about a particular issue and react in fear for being found out for their lack of knowledge and losing their

It specifically states in that article that negative blood serum tests are common in trophoblastic disease accompanying a gestation. You have to actually read the article, you click on a little link on the page.

Hook effect is a doctor problem. Doctors do not know about the hook effect. No doctor I have seen as their patient had heard of the Hook Effect or believed it possible to have false negatives. I have asked them all explicitly. Doctors make the blood test orders and none have ordered the lab techs to dilute for the

Um, no. I'm not sure why you're telling me to take birth control. Make your own reproductive decisions and don't tell other people what to do.

The placenta is in the middle in the view with anencephalic features labelled. The cord is visible between the two, moving in the video. The other sac is righter of that. If you look at my videos posted elsewhere on the thread you'll get a much clearer view of the two sacs and placentae.

Thank you. Yes I went to one, but almost all the clear pictures I've posted on here are from the transvaginal ultrasounds. The transabdominal ones didn't get anything really, and she didn't get anything, and 4D ones are only transabdominal. I was asking her to put the probe higher because that's where one fetus was

Thank you, I appreciate it. I know they aren't empty!

Those aren't x-rays. My story has absolutely not been told. Anna get half the facts in the article wrong and omitted all actual scientific information. That's not my story.

98.5% of people get my race wrong by looking at me. Are they all just suddenly right because they are 98.5 out of a group of 100? I think not. I am very familiar with the fact that facts do not run on majority rules. Facts are independent of the number of people that don't believe them and are based in the scientific

Nope, I haven't. I've circled a fetus with anencephaly in a corner sac against the uterine wall. If you want to see that full series, it's in a morphing time-lapse here.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cCOw2y…

It comes into focus around 13s. There are two brain hemispheres protruding from the top of the skull as in this

Who said there's no heartbeat? I already said that red/blue doppler patches are shooing up where the heart chambers are the few times they've done the Doppler. They are missing the heartbeat in the same way they're missing the glaring fetus.