No, just as there’s nothing false about me saying that you might be a pedophile.

Every now and then you’ll see a story about a male coach of a women’s team fired for having sex with one of his players or something. It happened at my high school — a young coach, and it was super obvious to all of us. Anyway, take the number of coaches caught for doing this, and multiply it by 2-3 and that’s the…

It’s a good pass. But I just want to mention something that I’ve noticed recently: oftentimes these “amazing vision” passes through a defense are much more jaw-dropping when viewed on birds-eye-view video than when actually done in the moment. I’m not saying that this type of pass isn’t satisfying to the passer or the…

What example are you talking about? I honestly don’t know what you’re referring to.

But you’re the one that can’t handle being challenged — hence your use of “gaslighting” in an attempt to shut down legitimate criticism of your position.

Where’s the video of Katt bombing on a stage and setting of equal prominence?

lol yes you would

Katt Williams says -- on good authority -- otherwise.

I don’t want to have a conversation with somebody who is going to scream “gaslight!” when their beliefs are challenged.

It’s likely the spec ops guys were simply told to shave before meeting the president. At my job — where I worked near troops — one particular unit was told to shave because it seemed likely they would be meeting the president when he made a stop at our location.

I understand you’re sort of joking, but it’s likely the spec ops guys were told to shave before meeting the president. At my job — where I worked near troops — one particular unit was told to shave because it seemed likely they would be meeting the president when he made a stop at our location.

I understand you’re sort of joking, but it’s likely the spec ops guys were told to shave before meeting the president. At my job -- where I worked near troops -- one particular unit was told to shave because it seemed likely they would be meeting the president when he made a stop at our location.

You made an insane statement and I called you out for it lmao

What hill do you think that is?

Nobody is saying the “injuring party” shouldn’t be culpable. Comprehension comprehension comprehension. Just to repeat what I said in my earlier post: “the main point of argument is whether what happened rose to the level of murder or not.”

A crushed trachea is NOT rough sex, and yet choking can easily kill someone if done too forcefully or incorrectly. People sometimes unintentionally kill somebody during the course of rough sex. It’s not common but it happens. It is more common than intentionally killing somebody during the course of rough sex, though.

Nice straw man, toots. Nobody is saying that what the man did wasn’t “wrong” — the main point of argument is whether what happened rose to the level of murder or not. In your original post, you suggested the man’s story doesn’t add up (“Nothing about this story passes the sniff test”). And the man’s story is that it…

Ahh, prison, truly the last bastion of casual sexual assault talk being OK. (It’s cool — Bad People are in prison so its OK!) I’m surprised you didn’t make a “drop the soap” joke.

Killing someone during sexual intercourse isn’t necessarily murder. I know this comes as a shocker for you, but the judicial system can assign an array of charges when someone is killed -- ranging from the most severe (murder) to least severe (manslaughter).

? Are you saying that your sexual history is Good and Right and Correct and our understanding of Right and Wrong sexual encounters should be based off of your Correct sexual history? People accidentally hurt people too much during rough sex. People intentionally kill people during rough sex. People unintentionally…