bereman08
Bereman08
bereman08

A lot of people, myself included, had to force the update on Android via the Google Play Store. 

The Problem with Charles Martinet? Let me tell you about The Problem With Apu.

for zone that can’t be played on turn 6, this is where you put your Bishop or play your nightcrawler early to move it there. Bishop can easily get 10 power alone in a zoo deck by the end of the game. Squirrel girl can also help to get to those unplayable zone. Sure Professor X can shutdown a zone completely but with

And Sanctum 2!

Kinda surprised that Tower Defense + FPS didn’t immediately conjure 2011's Sanctum? Gross looks good tho

So, 3rd person Darkwatch? Sign me up.

Is it so hard to believe that the Firaxis developers chose to work on this IP? In interviews I’ve seen, Jake Solomon has been adamant that they were pumped when Marvel reached out to them to develop something and he said their staff cheered when they announced they were doing something with Marvel. 

Really looking forward to this. As a big marvel fan I'm glad they picked the Midnight Suns to be the main team instead of the Avengers for the fifth time

Glad to see Kmart’s Revengers still makes news sites. I should install it and see if it is any more memorable than when I tried it last time. 

Not sure if you know but thats a crime to some people (who seem to have Frank Millers Batman lodged firmly up their ass)

Yeah...how about no? You wanna be toxic? Go teabag someone in Call of Duty. Marvel Snap is one of the few competitive games I’m actually enjoying and making it easier to harass/make fun of opponents would absolutely ruin that enjoyment. I get the game is competitive by nature but that doesn’t mean we have to cater to

Kotaku: Toxicity in online spaces is bad

Alow me to provide you a comprehensive list of all the times allowing “good-natured ribbing” did *not* degenerate into “toxic hate speech” in an internet game between anonymous opponents:

I always like to analyze this stuff as if I was across the table from the player (I have played magic for over 10 years) and honestly if I did anything like that IRL I would likely be told off by others at the store for being a bad sport so I have to agree with RenegadeReaper especially considering this is like the

How about we not try to promote the ability to be toxic?

Because Nintendo revealed a few details, that gives me the go ahead to post any of the other details. I am very smart.

Nintendo/Game Freak choosing to announce an evolution is an extremely different feeling from finding out by scrolling by information that can only be found by delving into leaks. This sucks and I was truly bummed to find out this way.

Obviously there’s going to be a varied range of opinions on what people do or don’t want to see, some people want to see everything and some people want to go out of there way to avoid even official information, but “treat official reveals as free to discuss and treat leaks as spoilers” is a pretty easy (and standard!)

I actually agree with OP on this. On the main page, without coming into the article, it spoils exactly WHICH pokemon gets a new evolution, which we only know of because of leaks. In addition, if OP has been avoiding press stuff on Pokemon, they might not even know what Farigiraf is, so you’ve spoiled them AGAIN in

So we’re just spoiling games that don’t come out for a week in headlines and lede photos now?