Describe this hamburger.

Was he crushed into a mailbox, or was he crushed against a mailbox?

Literally, no politics entered my argument. It’s as simple as saying don’t let kids play with matches. That’s common sense, not an agenda.

I know. *ollies out*

No, I’m making fun of you because you have no ideas and no reasoning, and probably your tin foil hat is too tight.

You say all that as if it doesn’t matter that somebody can buy a weapon that’s perfectly suited for killing dozens of people, and then go and kill dozens of people.

Corresponding with some of these gun-lovers replying to this post is like arguing with people who believe the world is flat and chem-trails are mind control fog... Yikes.

And therefore - we should make the most efficient weapons for killing, as easily obtainable as possible, because of what fucking reason? Because if people are going to murder, they should be able to murder as conveniently as possible? What?

You’ve literally just described a man who’s afraid and insecure. But more than likely, he’s paranoid and thinks a gun will be useful, because he’s a gullible sucker.

You know I think it’s a probability that excluding war situations, guns have always killed more people than they’ve saved.

There have been. And yet, they’re extremely uncommon, and even when done with intent, it’s very difficult for the driver to kill more than a handful of people.

I’m not seeing anything higher than 18 deaths on that list. They also don’t seem to happen that frequently. The guy in Jerusalem injured 45, not killed 45.

Well you obviuosly don’t think it’s important since you’re not going to look anyway. I don’t have to spoonfeed an adult who’s pretending they care.

Not really. Because you’d have a hard time killing 50 people with a car, without hatching some sort of overly elaborate plot. The efficiency of one tool for killing vs. another definitely weighs in on how we should treat them.

Really? When was the last time a single car killed 50 people in one incident? Even with intent, that’d be pretty damn hard to do.

If anybody really wants to break the law they will break the law. But we still make laws. Saying it’s stupid to make laws because somebody will just go and break them is asinine.

Cars don’t exist to kill things. Guns (aside from some amusement park toys and such) exist to kill things. I’m not sure why people pretend otherwise. Sure I can use a sword to slice a salami, but that doesn’t mean it’s not a deadly weapon.

I’m not sure what you want. I’m not going to use my time making screencaps or something. If you’re so concerned, you shouldn’t have a problem just reading the threads.

Yeah, check the replies to this story. Sorry if that wasn’t clear.

Tell you what?