Just poke around enough you’ll see it. I’m kind of tired of people being far more concerned about their supply of toys than about human beings.

Actually people have been improving cars for decades to make them safer for people. Because the government and industry realized cars had been a lot less safe for people than they could be. So they made new laws and changed cars themselves to make people safer.

But somebody might take away their toys! How will they enjoy being alive if somebody takes their toys away?

I’m more referencing some of the comments made in response to the article rather than the article itself. ;3

Oh ok. I’m sure that’s it.

Nobody with a life cares.

I’m always a bit suspicious of people who love guns a lot more than they love people.

Well if he is a criminal, he most certainly would have to have guns, as the NRA tells us, if we make any laws against having guns, only criminals will have them.

Possible right hook? Car turned across motorcyclist’s path? Or possibly just merged into them. Really common car-bike collision.

I love how writers on garker make it a point to note when a person is white, even when it has nothing at all to do with the story at hand. Just a bad writing habit? Filler to up the word count? No idea how to actually report facts pertinent to a story? A desperate attempt to seem cool by making fun of the one…

Oh Patrick, Jalopnik doesn’t have any haters.

obligatory:

Jowett Jupiter.

Fiat 128 also should be mentioned:

The 1966 Wartburg 353 merits a mention:

Now that’s what I call marketing.

Somebody better dispense the Justys.

Don’t forget Ford’s nearly mid engined econoline vans. You can see the engine cover peeking out here.

I thought high hood lines were bad for pedestrian safety, since they tend to fling people under the car instead of over it. That’s why SUVs are so much worse in vehicle-ped collisions.