I was just going to post that this sounds like a plan for Trump to combat global warming, which also doesn’t exist.

But even giving people their days in court doesn’t excuse the use of “allegedly” in some of the examples in this article. Anthony “accused” Weinstein of “allegedly” assaulting her? That makes no sense. The word “accused” already indicates Weinstein hasn’t had his day in court yet, so why do we need the additional…

Then Anankin’s light saber should have been red in Revenge of the Sith — he had already committed mass murder at that point.

“I can like what someone has produced without feeling like I’m endorsing them as a person.” — I can agree with that depending on, (1) whether the bad thing they did is something I can overlook or not. I cannot overlook murder or rape, for example. And (2), whether their work was related to the crime. I can never…

As an older person myself, I have to say the biggest mistake was putting old people in these movies. The younger generation does NOT want to watch 55-year old Tom Cruise play a 30-year old man with a 30-year old girlfriend. They do not want to watch Russell Crowe, if they even know who he is. They do not want to watch…

Reeves looks like a 50-something man who aged well. Compared to, say, Tom Cruise, who looks like a paunchy 50-something man who used nips, tucks, and botox to try to age well but only half succeeded. There’s a difference, so kudos to Reeves.

Re: the green camouflage — they’re not just racist, but dumb too. There’s a reason smart people wear orange when deer hunting. But maybe that’s Darwinism, so I shouldn’t complain.

There’s money to be made in selling guns. That money is more important than any number of innocent lives. If there’s a god, all the GOP members should burn in hell.

Yeah, I think they started throwing in the “modern” word so that they don’t have to include, or remind people, of the previous horrors. I think that was deliberate.

The sex scene was a terrible “joke,” because the offer came from a woman who was being held captive and was totally dependent on Eggsy saving her, so it can hardly be considered consensual. And the fact that Eggsy collected on the offer makes him a dick (but to be fair to Eggsy, the filmmakers clearly considered the…

As a former Hawaii resident, . . . loved that shaka!

I haven’t seen the movie, but I’m sure he’s very scary in it. However, whenever I saw photos of Skarsdard’s Pennywise, all I could see was Carrot Top.

Why SHOULD there be “consequences” on both sides? One side is discriminating against people, and the other side is simply complaining about the discrimination — there should only be consequences on the first side.

To quote (steal from?) “The Onion,” hopefully the next director gives them the version of a bigger Death Star that they’re looking for.

My LG G1 that I got for free is still going strong (has a crappy camera, though). I am not Apple’s target market.

If I needed food and water, I’d loot too. But I also wonder if this (the possibility of being looted) is why some people do not evacuate when they should. That’s a dangerous precedent (protecting property over life).

Costco still reigns supreme in our neck of the woods. Our Costco patrons are almost like cult members.

I’m sure the scene is very entertaining. But I also think that makes one too many time jumps for me. The movie start in modern times, then jumps back to the old days, then ends back in modern times. And this extra scene then jumps back to the old days again? I think this additional scene might work better if the…

Thanks for the explanation.

Selena’s sister even had them make a match of one of her most-used lipsticks