It almost seems like chaos is the goal, though?

His leaks (that’s plural) directly put soldiers in grave danger; if you think punishing one of these people with 35 years in military prison is fitting, you can’t possibly think it’s fair to give the other a complete pass and a senior cabinet position. That makes no logical sense, besides being unfair.

As a Sanders supporter, I highly fucking doubt it, but what does that have to do with the relative importance of these two leaks? Absolutely nothing.

The revival or the Russian Orthodox church and the rise of Putin’s authoritarian, patriarchal regime are no coincidence. This is a conscious pairing of reinforcing ideologies that are anti-democracy, anti-woman, anti-civil rights, anti-transparency, etc. and based in public ignorance and fear, rigid hierarchical power…

He shouted down and chastised CNN and Buzzfeed because those were the outlets who ran the MI6 agent’s story, refusing to take their questions and calling them “fake news” and “pile of garbage” respectively. Someone asked the CNN reporter’s question (as it should be) when Trump refused to answer that reporter, but he…

That’s what happens when you ask as rhetorical question and someone answers it in earnest.

That’s a fabulous photograph :)

Depends on who’s making that assertion, what elements could or could not be verified by a second source, and the quality of their evidence, whether or not I could publicize all of that evidence legally or not. I think it also matters whether the information is something that is influencing the policy decisions of…

Well, what did DNC’s e-mail hack reveal? Some petty infighting and poor e-mail hygiene, but mostly nothing. We don’t know the pedigree of the Trump info, but both the huge substance of the allegations and the fact that they were circulating with EVERY key decision maker for months makes them newsworthy to me. If…

I think it’s prudent to take a skeptical but open minded view of this dossier. On the one hand, this reads as too-good-to-be-true for those who oppose Trump, and some details don’t jive with other accepted facts; apparently the “Says who” guy claims to have an alibi for one of the dates he was supposed to be in…

Regardless, that was an astonishingly spineless/oblivious reaction from the rest of the press; if this asshole is willing to shout down two news outlets for unflattering coverage, these people need to understand that there’ll be no one there to defend them when he inevitably does the same.

she was a member of the military actively and intentionally releasing classified military data that she knew would put men and women in uniform already in harm’s way at greater danger

I guess that was it for questions and “answers”. This lawyer is gaslighting us about Trump’s massive conflicts of interest now in dulcet tones, and I think that’ll be it.

Oh my god, he answered follow up on tax returns with “you’re the only one who cares” and “I won, I’m president”, and people clap for him dgjnerg j a;ehy3-0

“If Putin likes Trump, that’s an asset”................TO PUTIN!

“maybe unknowingly”

He’s gone over 14 subjects in 2 minutes, no new details. He’s riffing. Chances of him actually taking questions are dropping precipitously...

The sentence was way out of range. Trump’s own National Security adviser leaked intel to Pakistan with at least as much consequence to field operations, and what was his punishment? He was informally reprimanded

I can’t find a hard schedule. There are as many as 15 potential witnesses who may speak, but it depends on time.

but I have taste