It def. wasn’t leaked by Trump’s camp, unless they planted it in Clinton’s oppo research last summer; it’s been circulating for months and came through a private spying firm tied to MI6 that the dems hired. It’s 6 months old.

I’ve heard John Lewis will also be opposing him. You got Coretta Scott King’s letter against Sessions, and now another of MLK’s compatriots... I hope it’s brutal.

See, I got these funny feet that are very tall with very small footprints, so I gotta try them on.

My sister asked me to go shoe shopping today and I turned her down to follow the hearings instead.

That will be blockbuster, Tillerson’s hearing was already going to be intense and now probably bananas, as will John Lewis and Corey Booker testifying against Sessions. I have so much work to do today and I know I’m not going to get most of it done.

He’s been whining about the how unfair leaks are... this is the guy who talked about wikileaks constantly before the election, and asked Russia to hack his opponent.

Ugh, this unrelenting shithead. I don’t understand his role in any of this. If this dump is fake, he can say so but hasn’t. If it’s true, he’s going out of his way to be less credible on it due to clear, unnecessary, public partisanship...? He’s acting like he’s the one compromised, which doesn’t make sense.

As much as I hate Trump, journalists and intelligence agents were correct in holding back on details they couldn’t confirm. The problem is that Comey didn’t take the same approach to Huma Abedin’s fucking laptop.

I think it’s good to pay attention to skeptics. I think he’s often wrong-headed in his focus, and he says things the wrong way... but he’s not usually wrong, either.

The financials, collusion, the *non-pee* stuff is by far the more explosive, and the fact that it is all so plausible is really his biggest and most immediate problem. I think this is rather a big fucking deal regardless. Twitter is awesome right now, btw.

CNN published first, but didn’t reveal the details. David Corn actually wrote pretty much the same story before the election in Mother Jones. Buzzfeed is the first to publish the details, and there’s a good reason that the first two didn’t; they couldn’t independently verify.

You should also read this;

But does he like #goldenshowers ?

It’s brutal because it’s true :)

Well said.

I agree both with your assessment of his intent to be martyred and the appropriateness of denying it to him for the foreseeable future, even though it’s on technical grounds.

So you started a thread about the status of consent for Trump’s sexual grabbing of women because you don’t have an opinion on the subject? You are a shitty liar lol

Predictable dodge. I am not talking about Broaddrick, I’m talking about Donald Trump, and you are refusing to say whether you believe his accusers because either answer you give will make you look like a fool, same reason you haven’t addressed any of my fellow commenters’ blows to your stupid argument here.

I don’t want to say they were lying

Except that the women said they did not consent.