Does he have to worry about his statements being used in another jurisdiction if the prosecutor (or another plaintiff) can overcome the usual objections?

Yes, but .... your lawyer should tell you not to answer the question if it tries to pry into a privileged area, such as attorney-client communications.

Three beers does not soggy make.

Why was a public prosecutor involved in helping force Cosby to testify in the context of a private civil case?

Have you seen the exact wording of the notorious agreement?

Would be nice to see what the shadowy “agreement” actually says.

+1 Soggy legal brain.

Something like the near-unattainable “incontrovertible scientific proof of certain cause and effect” manufacturers demand when research suggests one of their products is a health hazard.

The promise was probably necessary to induce his deposition testimony.

Chocolate raisins and jelly beans each have 4 calories, but “daily options” haha favor chocolate raisins 25-15? Must be the fiber lobby flexing its muscle, er, belly.

The advisory committee report cited in the article has a ton of good info, though the political process saw to it that a good chunk of it was deep-sixed.

+1 Great article

It’s turned into a political CYA hot potato, long after the actual spud exploded.

Like a vegetable, of course!

So...

BBQ may not be a vegetable, though

The Donald has an aversion to flattery.

“Do you poop?”

Thanks.

Sorry. Yes, I was asking exactly that.