Interesting article. Deplorable personal attack.

That’s not the standard of proof clause. Why, it’s not even the sanity clause.

Good work, counselor. Medowlarked Lemon, J. D., has a nice ring to it.

A distinction without a difference. It matters not.

I sure hope they’ll let me play sprinkler tomorrow after I get this rancid raccoon out of my system..

That appears to be 1/2 of a Chinese radish next to his head.... Where’s the other half?

Haven’t located the policy at Amazon.com.

A face that would turn Medusa to stone, that not even a mother could love, that launched a thousand shits (no wait, that was Wrigley...) etc. So pretty easy to save it.

Kirstin -

After breakfast, during the late morning/early afternoon, cats I know curl up, stretch out, or flop into snooze positions and generally don’t give a shit. That’s when you can trim their nails, brush them, cut out tangles, and mess with their paws, ears, and tails without fear of reprisal.

In other words, “my cat has not yet identified my fingers, nose, eyes, or genitals as snacks, but only because he’s so well fed. I really hope that as I get older, I can continue to feed him paté and quail eggs three times a day.”

I had been under the misimpression that a typical dec action does not feature parties who have already been through an agreed-upon dispute resolution process. At least that’s what I thought I remembered from my law school courses with Prof. Blackstone.

+1 Perfect Deadspin item.

Thanks for your collective responses. Sounds like the NFLPA’s blustery pre-filing statements would make the case ripe enough.

Hmm. Where’s the NFL’s case or controversy?

+1 refined knowledge of Constitution

Let’s see the documents.

Similar (longer) words were uttered by many a criminal court judge who faulted a since-exonerated convict for refusing to display “remorse.”

No, but it’s not as if Linda Goodman Tripp betrayed Jesus.

Hrrmph. No Glühwein für you!