As a gamma male I mostly wear the pants. Unless I get angry if that happens I just bust right out of them. I usually like to wear purple pants as that color compliments my slighty greenish skin tone.

I know a girl who uses those terms. She always describes herself as an alpha and how she can't get along with other alphas and how alphas don't like it when other alphas are in their territory and I'm just sitting there like, are you human beings or fucking tigers? What is all this nonsense?

99% sure that letter wasn't actually written by a woman.

He is so beta, he won't make any decisions or plans or take responsibility for anything. I find myself longing for an alpha man.

I think the telling bit is where he tells her that when he tries to lead, she doesn't follow. She is the alpha she's been looking for all along.

The last (ok, only) relationship i had, i don't think anyone "wore the pants".

Does this mean we spent the whole time naked? (I hope it does)

Pants are a tool of oppression by the patriarchy. Let's all rebel and lounge around in underwear.

This isn't that scary, it's a bit sad even. But it is my story, for real!

Yeah, daring to expose her breast whilst breastfeeding seems to be the issue here. Ridiculous. You should not have to smother your child if you don't want to. Some babies really do not like it and it is ridiculous to demand it of people. It is also illegal to demand it of people.

Oh, you didnt get the memo. These people only care about the "unborn" and punishing the sluts who got pregnant. They dont really care about humans, once born.

So, in parts of America, people force women to give birth to children but the same people won't allow said women to feed their babies? OKAY THEN.

There are certainly areas where reasonable people can disagree about matters of opinion. It's not a matter of opinion that nowhere did the writer imply that all touch would be unwelcome. She didn't. You clearly have an opinion about whether it's acceptable for any touch to be unwelcome, ever, and you have every…

Children do not exist to meet adults' emotional needs. They're not pets, they're people. They have emotional needs of their own, and perhaps the greatest one is that they get to say who is and isn't allowed to touch them. It's really frightening that you don't see any problem with what you wrote.

It doesn't really matter what you "seriously doubt". All humans have ownership of their own bodies, and kids have a much harder time learning that if they're constantly being forced to touch people or allow themselves to be touched against their will. No one here is advocating that kids be allowed to scream and yell…

By saying grandmother's exist to huge their grandchildren you are expressly implying that grandchildren exist for their grandmothers. That's not true. People and children exist for their own reasons, they are not large stuffed animals.

I guess you missed this part:

Not at all related to children, but I recently got a dog, and I've had several not so pleasant interactions when people reach down to pet my dog without asking. She's only a year old and has had barely any training (she's a rescue), and she's about 40 pounds and jumps on people when she's excited. She loves people so…

I love this, and that you're doing this for your daughter. The idea that little kids aren't people who have just as much right to refuse physical affection as anyone else is kind of mind-boggling to me. Can you imagine someone telling you as a full grown adult "Hug this person that you just met!" Ick.

It's always strange to me that people always tend to want to touch two things: dogs and children. And not just touch, but pick them up, put them on our laps, hug them, squeeze them, tickle them, kiss them, rub their hands and feet. None of this is done with the permission of the child/animal. (The animal, some people…

but she doesn't lack practice at all. She has plenty of practice initiating and reciprocating wanted touch.