Is it? There are a few version floating around, one with Idina's voice pitch adjusted and a few male covers. My ear is not good enough to tell which is which.

Unfortunately that seems to be a consequence of liberals trying to be inclusive and empathizing with others. Any lapse in judgement "proves" that liberals are secretly jst hypocritical bigots. Whereas conservatives... well, if you make hatred and bigotry central tenants of your politics and religion, then yeah, you…

In comparison to Aila Wang we are all amateurs.

I don't see the problem. This is a good idea. Better than buying an outfit for a special occasion.

I really like this version. Much as I love Idina, I find the original song to be a headache trigger for me.

I think this one is a guy covering it, but same idea

There is a version floating around on the internet where the pitch has been altered so it's significantly lower (actually sounds like a guy singing) and it's SO MUCH BETTER because there is no yell-singing.

I have a friend who thinks all baby boys should be given a vasectomy and that way anybody having children would have to think it out and actively decide that is what they want. That goes against my beliefs about bodily autonomy, but I would still very much like to see it debated as a serious policy discussion. But…

Next on their agenda? What next? These people are already screaming about birth control being covered under healthcare and doing the best they can to prevent it being covered, not to mention making sure proper sex ed that teaches effective birth control methods isn't allowed anywhere near schools.

Do other people have a sense that the pro-life movement is just louder and more aggressive than the pro-choice movement? I often feel like the left is somewhat disorganized and more passive. This could completely be a biased opinion based on the fact that the majority of people I know who are really engaged activists…

Yup. Yes, she was born extremely privileged and of course that helped her out. But privilege and talent aren't mutually exclusive. This woman is involved in some of the most interesting films that have come out in the past few years and she's helped fund projects that wouldn't have come out without her help. She's…

Miscast. She's really too young for the role and as much as I like her I think most of the praise/nominations she's getting for it are because she's Jennifer Lawrence, not because of the performance.

I have always wondered about this. Why do people think saying someone is gay is a deterrent to having a crush on a celebrity? It's not like DAMN! I would've been in with a chance if only he was straight! How is fantasizing about a gay celebrity different than fantasizing about any other celebrity?

I totally thought this was Chris Evans on first glance. Well done Neville.

I want to hang out with Simon Amstell and Josh can come too.

A lot of it felt stifled to me. The performances were good and I love Edward Norton, but his accent was distracting enough to take me out of the story a lot.

No, I was just referring to the quality of the movies. I like the book a lot, but I think everything in the film works to keep the audience at arms length. Technically there's some very nice work but it sacrifices emotion for style.

I'm not sure what about my comment implies that, and I'd argue that plot-wise Atonement could be seen as more tragic than any of the other films I mentioned. But I thought it was a cold film that didn't make the central relationship worth the heavy emotional investment the film asks you to make, and I thought large…

I'm still scandalized by it getting so little in the way of awards attention, especially for Rachel Weisz not getting an Oscar nom.

I'm always so relieved to see Richard Madden nowadays. (I know that's silly but the trauma!)