This is philosophy! We're discussing whether (and if so, why) interspecies sex is morally wrong. A ludicrous or extreme conclusion suggests that our premises should be re-examined.

Dolphins are extremely powerful and muscular, so receptive sex with a male would be worse than dangerous—-in all probability, deadly. A female dolphin can apparently time her orgasm to match that of a human male. Sex for dolphins is a lot more of a social thing than it is for humans, so they don't agonize about who to…

Let's assume it's not, that it's mutually enjoyable (otherwise we can pick some other kind of animal). If it's okay for a dog and a cat, what about a dog and a developmentally disabled human?

This is as close as we'll ever get to an Edward / Jacob pairing.

Why do you hate my religious freedom?

Or to put it another way… EVERYBODY OUT OF THE WATER !!!

New Agers used to think they were intelligent, even spiritual. So having sex with one wouldn't be like having sex with a pig, for instance.

Well, they do make those translation collars. The real issue is that dogs don't possess "language" as we understand it. No grammar means no discourse, only emotive utterances and a lot of body language.

I thought that's what the internet was FOR!

His or mine?

The word "tribe" is actually derived from "tribadists."

(Flips through Bible.) Well, there's nothing against it in the rulebook…

If I rub my dog's belly, does that count as second base?

I dunno, my high school girlfriend's parents got married before they knew each other's languages.

Maybe he did it on purpose?

You're just Stroganoff.

I heard he was foiled by threats of a writers' strike.

I'm improv-ing.

So Sarek and Amanda did a bad thing?

Male / female sex raises more or less the same questions.