I think the upside for Tennessee is you get more picks now, re-tool other positions, and suck for another year, and draft a QB next year, no? Best of both worlds.
I think the upside for Tennessee is you get more picks now, re-tool other positions, and suck for another year, and draft a QB next year, no? Best of both worlds.
I'm just going to leave this here:
Not whining about anything. I’m more than satisfied with the 5 World Series titles the Yanks have won in my lifetime or the 3 Stanley cups the Devils won. I’m simply explaining why I would change that World Series if I could change 1 moment. That’s literally the entire point of this article. Less than 2 months after…
Somebody posted the Hand of God above, that reminded me of another honorable mention. Still sticking with my original Game 7 2001 World Series, but I’d have to say an honorable mention goes to Chris fucking Wondolowski blowing that easy goal against Belgium.
Very nicely done.
True. People always forget that.
Yeah...but for that goal though, could have had back-to-back in 94-95, and prevented the fucking Rangers from winning one. And of course it’s great thinking about the 10 years after that when the Devils were by far the better team...but it still stings. And I really loathe the Rangers. I wish we could still chant…
I’m not saying in a baseball sense. I’m talking “deserved” in the fairy tale ending sense given that 9/11 was a month and a half earlier.
I’m a Yankees-Devils fan, so yes. Both of those outcomes are not only acceptable, but desirable.
Hands down I’d have to go with Mariano Rivera in Game 7 of the 2001 World Series. I’d change that blown save. And while that blown save wasn’t a single “play.” You can easily break it down to changing one play...Tony Womack hits a broken bat grounder to Jeter for the 6-4-3 World Series winning double play instead of…
Nope you're doing it wrong. It goes like this:
Just a thought...but not allowing it back to the seats is probably a bad idea. You're going to encourage people to pound 2 or 3 right there. Making people trek to and from their seats to get a hard drink will slow people down some...
Looks like he did a pretty good job of landing softly in the grass imho.
THIS. Gustbuster's are the best. I live in a particularly windy neighborhood of NYC on the East River, and the Gustbuster has lived up to it's name. I believe this is the model I have:
THIS. Gustbuster's are the best. I live in a particularly windy neighborhood of NYC on the East River, and the…
I prefer making an attempt before straight up asking. If I nail it (about 50% of the time), I feel like a boss. If I fuck it up, I don't feel bad because I'm sure the waiter has heard worse, and probably heard the same mispronunciation I made. I just feel like the anti-thesis of a boss when I preemptively ask for…
I think I'm also supported in that interpretation by the other application of this rule to "followers" aka "fans." This rule is meant to apply to premature court storming as well. Premature court storming would certainly block passing lanes, but I don't think I've ever seen a technical foul called under this rule in…
The fact that the game had to be stopped for him isn't sufficient. That's clear from the wording of the rule that says if no interference, essential re-set play to where it was and continue from there. And again, all he did was "delay the game by preventing the ball from being promptly made live..." that alone is not…
How has no one mentioned that the officials actually got the no-call correct in this case?
You're wrong. Section 4.10.1.C - "Delaying the game by preventing the ball from being promptly made live or by preventing continuous play, such as but not limited to, followers or bench personnel entering the playing court before player activity has been terminated. When the delay does not interfere with play, it…
Meanwhile on Twitter, @darrenrovell: "Getting so hard right now reading the @nike @vol_sports brand audit #brand"