becauseofthe-implication
Because of the Implication
becauseofthe-implication

nvm, you are right.

nvm, you are right.

I’ve been in DC for six years, so it has been shame-free for at least that long. The Caps have been here even longer...

Japan is a shame based culture. If she loses to a 12 year old, 50/50 chance she commits seppuku.

This isn’t really accurate or at least wasn’t following WW2. They didn’t see what they did and own up to it. They were forced to view what they did at gun point, then had all their NAZI leaders (rightfully) hanged at Nuremberg. Germany was forced into reconciliation and had whole new generations that only knew of

“they can’t really know male privilege having lived such a tormented early existence.”

Except prior to invading Russia, they also had the rest of the Western European economy and some of the Eastern European economy under their thumb (except U.K. And Russia).

So wouldn’t doctors be on the hook for illegal prescriptions, not pharmacists?

The guy is mixed race.

French-Canadians aren’t even from France. They are from Quebec. They just speak French.

French Canadians aren’t French. They just speak French. It’d be like using the Pennsylvania Dutch to bloviate about German attitudes.

Not that it isn’t equally bad to be posing, but she obviously isn’t holding it. The people on either side are and she has her arms around them.

Now everyone is shilling for #vanlife?

She’s been an amber alert for two months. Everyone knows her name and her picture.

Would you agree that Werenski was up and skating off under his own power during the actual goal? Because that would imply not serious enough to stop the play. There is a bunch of precedence for this.

Feel free to google the NHL rule book. You will find that you sound stupid spouting off about the refs not blowing the whistle.

“Game 3: Referees can’t find their whistles to stop play while the Jackets’ Werenski lays bleeding on the ice, allowing play to continue and the Penguins to tie up the game on their way to a victory.”

Nah, my assumption is that they are referring to the teachers who promote this sort of stuff. They are the self proclaimed torch carriers of liberal values.

So your range for a “great fortune” is the 100 richest people in the world? Because my range would be anyone who can comfortable own a couple million dollar home to park his couple million dollar yacht at. If he is responsible, his net worth is likely 50 million or up. If he is irresponsible, he’d likely still be

You could crew it with one person. 150k is definitely a low ball assuming almost nothing breaks (which never happens).

Did the Brewers buy a Juicero?