becauseofthe-implication
Because of the Implication
becauseofthe-implication

My uncle has a Mercedes sprinter van camper variant and it is awesome. Smartly, he also has a home.

Seems pretty progressive to not assume how a stranger identifies.

I’m now laughing like a lunatic in my cube. Thanks for making me the office weirdo.

He is just trying to obliquely fight America’s war on obesity and late night trips to Taco Bell.

It is a prime example of correlation doesn’t equal causation. Pot smoking doesn’t cause experimentation with other drugs, just that people who experiment with other drugs probably started with pot (except for opiate addicts, they start with whatever the doctor gave them).

In my friend group of about 30 guys I was close with in college, 8 years out, all but two still smoke recreationally. All are employeed. Half are happily married. None have committed crimes (beyond smoking weed). All, but one (PHD candidate) are making between $60k and $250k. That is a bunch of successful people

So Jason Statham as Alladin?

D.A.G would be amaze balls!

Or alternatively, anyone with $700 bucks.

No, my point is that they are equally bad, but not worse or better based on their closeness. That said, conquering was a legitimate form of land acquisition at the time it happened, for both Native Americans and Europeans. We know this because Empires existed on both sides of the Atlantic before contact.

No, I get it. I am just stating that your logic doesn’t make sense. Being killed by outsiders from 200 miles away is no different than outsiders from 2000 miles away. Let’s try a modern example: was South East Asia marketedly better when it was conquered by the British or when it was conquered by Japan (pre WW2 and

Neither did the Aztecs or Mayans when they would conquer, then sacrifice the people of a conquered territory. It’s the same shit, different skin color as what was going on before Europeans ever got here.

The actual Pew study puts that actual question at 28%.

“Fully 60 percent of Americans and 85 percent of Democratic-leaning voters believe the federal government should ensure healthcare coverage for all Americans.” 

Is there anything unconstitutional about deporting undocumented immigrants?

Huh? That doesn’t make sense. The difference between your neighbor killing you and stealing your land and a guy from England killing you and stealing your land is irrelevant. Logic this one out. If your tribe owns present day California, why would that give you more rights to present day Nevada than say the people of

This. I know the guy who plays Penguin on Gotham. He is gay IRL, but he said he regularly got shit for not playing gay in season one by other gays. Then they allude to a relationship between him and a guy who is going to become the riddler and bigots are pissed the character is gay. Gays are pissed that two villain

Are you high? Native American tribes regularly warred over land prior to European intervention. They didn’t have the same idea of personal property rights, but they definitely held tribal lands. Hell, some even built empires of conquest.

I let my personal assistant handle all the service people at my home. It is a lot easier that way.

The jobs aren’t desirable at miserable wages. I find it hilarious when ostensibly liberal people make this argument. We shouldn’t enforce immigration laws so we can exploit undocumented people at low wages. We should pay what food costs, not what price we can get it to paying ridiculously low wages.