Lord knows I don’t want a President who’s going to look down her nose at my perverted relations

Eh...I used to find this argument somewhat persuasive, but 2017-18 showed that the GOP are still too scared to nuke the thing even though it had every incentive to do so. Full control of Government! Probable Conservative SCOTUS majority for years! I mean shit, they could have outlawed abortion at the Federal level and…

Sir [removes white glove, slaps your face with it], my grandmother’s dick was a saint.

Vaping tastes like sucking C3P0's farts through the handle of a MicroTouch razor.

Oh no, you’ve upset them!

Eh we should just kinda get used to this. If we can do it they can do it. Doesn’t mean we have to like it.

Why Your Team Sucks 2019: Vatican Ballfondlers

But this is incomplete analysis. Have you factored in how many conservatives likely stayed home because Judge Humbert Humbert was running for office? You think Doug Jones would’ve beaten Luther Strange?

Well I guess he can run in the Colorado primary and see what happens then.

Buzz Killington sez: Yeah the Buckeyes can suck it, but sneering at the quality of a perfectly fine state university that a ton of poor and middle class people attend every year in order to better their lives is a bad look for a lefty blog IMO. Not like they attended Kim Kardashian Online Speed College or something.

polls shouldn’t dictate public policy.

whether it’s any other kind of supremacy

Stop fomenting violence with your astrophysical rhetoric.

If your utopia still contains violence, you have to walk over to your NES console and hit the “RESET” button to start a new game, duh.

Wouldn’t it be weird if she won and it then turned out she just entered to advance her country music career, and that she was president of another country back home?

Plus you can really swing for the fences when you’re about to get your ass kicked.

That’s a fair position, but I just disagree that, based on what I’ve read on the topic, that a +/-1% estimate of revenues is likely. Don’t think we even disagree on policy, just our confidence in the outcome of that policy.

My issue is more with the analogy to violent crime, not the feasibility of the policy.

Then surely you know that there are budgets you cannot exceed, and/or which are very tight, and/or function as targets that you are expected to meet. But they are still estimates.