bbberlin
bbberlin
bbberlin

The administration also wants Mexico to agree to hold would-be immigrants while their cases go through American immigration courts.

Post school outcomes are also really startling, especially for arts and humanities students.

For example, you can earn your BFA in one of the very reputable New York or California art and design schools, or say you get your bachelors and masters in anthropology at a good private university, and say conservatively you

I’m a foreigner (though not in America), and honestly I’d be stoked if the local theatre had “subtitles” night. If it’s not your first language, sometimes you miss quiet bits or mishear a word.

Yeah, it’s kinda stunning that the FBI hasn’t realized how fundamental their problem is in regards to cyber security. If you have the option to work in a high salary non-hierarchal environment, in popular international cities with great career mobility, it’s no surprise that many IT people would then look quite

Singlish? Ok lah, that’s mostly just English with a few Mandarin words mixed in. ;)

Personally I would agree with you, that behaviour is dumb... if people aren’t blocking anyone/ jostling for space, then I feel like “who am I to define how he should experience this.” As you said though, in a crowded museum... that sounds pretty anti-social to be blocking every piece for your photo. :/

While I wouldn’t support a ban... honestly taking photographs in a gallery can be really rude to other people if it’s busy, and also the end result is going to be inferior to the 50cent postcard you could buy in the gift shop.

If it’s an empty place, I mean go ahead, whatever floats your boat... but it definitely can

With the added side effect that European and Asian companies who might consider doing business with/expanding to the States go “yeah, that looks like a nightmare, lets put that off for now.”

Again, I don’t think it’s an organized boycott, or people closing up existing businesses, as much as it’s just “well America

There’s always a bit of a struggle: galleries realize they can be cold, intimidating, and unfriendly to the general public, and they really do try to run accessibility programs and encourage engagement from everyone. I’ve been to some institutions where the security staff are particularly forward, almost like a

I dunno if defensive pride in German heritage is especially common in Canada though... because while everything you say is true (I mean Waterloo/Kitchener used to be “New Berlin”), a pretty sizeable portion of Canada has German heritage, and the image of Germany was rehabilitated really quickly with many post-war

No worries; I appreciate it’s a somewhat complicated subject.

I think people might still object to that because it treats a real violent event as lowly fuel for a creative experiment; the problem of Emmett Till being treated like a bowl of fruit is still there. Now there are a bunch of possible solutions to this...

Do academics have a disagreements? Sure. I’m laying out the case that Dana Schutz’s piece is bad art, and offensive. I come to that conclusion from looking at what Dana Schutz studies, how she studies it, and what she has produced. Obviously some people disagree with that (i.e. the Whitney curators), but this article

Thanks. I appreciate that it’s a complicated discussion.

It’s not subjective: the reason Dana Schuz is academically/professionally important, and the subject of exhibitions in New York and worldwide is because of the formal aspects of her work. This is what art criticism (worldwide) of Schutz is focused on: the process-driven aspect of the paintings, the gestures, the

How could she have done the painting in a way that you wouldn’t be able to say this afterwards? (Other than to not do it at all because she’s white)

There’s a few things going on; first, lets be clear that Dana Schutz is one of the most famous American artists in the world right now, with her work held in collections across the United States and the world, and her work probably is already included in contemporary art history books. She has a level of professional

If Wikileaks is to be believed, the files were already released into the wild by the time Wikileaks got their hands on it. Apparently they’d been in circulation for some time.

Wikileaks claimed it planned to release files later, but it’s press conference came under cyber attack. Whether or not that’s true, no one can know.

Regardless of exact timing though, the key information seems to be that the CIA lost control of its arsenal, into the wild. The files seems to cap out at 2016... but did

While Assange is a douchebag who is likely to be a willing or naive helper of the Russian government, the CIA’s loss of its cyber weapons programs (like the actual programs, not just documents pertaining to their existence), is a pretty massive news story, along with the revelations that it held exploits to basically

Jesus... these are all the same fucking guy? I know of these awful cases independently, but I didn’t know they were all the same dude. WTF.